Re: why partition pruning doesn't work?
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: why partition pruning doesn't work? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 12624.1528578026@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: why partition pruning doesn't work? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: why partition pruning doesn't work?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
I wrote:
> One thing I'm wondering about is why in the world are PartitionPruneInfo
> and its subsidiary struct types declared in primnodes.h?
Oh, and while I'm bitching: it seems like there is hardly any part of
the partitioning code in which the comments aren't desperately in need
of a copy-editing pass. They are just chock-full of misspellings,
grammar that is faulty enough to make the meaning unclear, and/or
errors of fact. An example of the latter is the repeated claims that
the basic partitioning functions belong to the planner. Maybe that
was true at some stage of development; but AFAICS the logic in question
now lives in src/backend/partitioning/, which I would not think is
part of the planner.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: