Re: freezing tuples ( was: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? )

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jeff Davis
Тема Re: freezing tuples ( was: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? )
Дата
Msg-id 1250204468.24981.94.camel@monkey-cat.sm.truviso.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: freezing tuples ( was: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? )  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: freezing tuples ( was: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? )  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 18:46 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Yeah, making the limit "slushy" would doubtless save some writes, with
> not a lot of downside.

OK, then should we make this a TODO? I'll make an attempt at this.

> > And people who don't care about forensic evidence can set it to 0-100M.
> 
> Everybody *thinks* they don't care about forensic evidence.  Until they
> need it.

We already allow setting vacuum_freeze_min_age to zero, so I don't see a
solution here other than documentation.

Regards,Jeff Davis



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: freezing tuples ( was: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? )
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: freezing tuples ( was: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? )