Re: freezing tuples ( was: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? )
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: freezing tuples ( was: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? ) |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 29393.1250204757@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: freezing tuples ( was: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? ) (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: freezing tuples ( was: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age
100m? )
Re: freezing tuples ( was: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? ) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> writes:
> On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 18:46 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Everybody *thinks* they don't care about forensic evidence. Until they
>> need it.
> We already allow setting vacuum_freeze_min_age to zero, so I don't see a
> solution here other than documentation.
Yeah, we allow it. I just don't want to encourage it ... and definitely
not make it default.
What are you envisioning exactly? If vacuum finds any reason to dirty
a page (or it's already dirty), then freeze everything on the page that's
got age > some lower threshold?
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: