Re: freezing tuples ( was: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? )
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: freezing tuples ( was: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? ) |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 29103.1250203570@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: freezing tuples ( was: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? ) (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: freezing tuples ( was: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age
100m? )
Re: freezing tuples ( was: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? ) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> writes:
> Let's say that we had a range like 50-100M, where if it's older than
> 100M, we freeze it, and if it's older than 50M we freeze it only if it's
> on a dirty page. We would still have forensic evidence, but we could
> make a range such that we avoid writing multiple times.
Yeah, making the limit "slushy" would doubtless save some writes, with
not a lot of downside.
> And people who don't care about forensic evidence can set it to 0-100M.
Everybody *thinks* they don't care about forensic evidence. Until they
need it.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: