Re: freezing tuples ( was: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? )

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: freezing tuples ( was: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? )
Дата
Msg-id 29103.1250203570@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: freezing tuples ( was: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? )  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
Ответы Re: freezing tuples ( was: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? )  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
Re: freezing tuples ( was: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? )  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> writes:
> Let's say that we had a range like 50-100M, where if it's older than
> 100M, we freeze it, and if it's older than 50M we freeze it only if it's
> on a dirty page. We would still have forensic evidence, but we could
> make a range such that we avoid writing multiple times.

Yeah, making the limit "slushy" would doubtless save some writes, with
not a lot of downside.

> And people who don't care about forensic evidence can set it to 0-100M.

Everybody *thinks* they don't care about forensic evidence.  Until they
need it.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Josh Berkus
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PERFORM] Re: freezing tuples ( was: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? )
Следующее
От: Jeff Davis
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: freezing tuples ( was: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? )