Re: operator exclusion constraints

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: operator exclusion constraints
Дата
Msg-id 12134.1257620905@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: operator exclusion constraints  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
Ответы Re: operator exclusion constraints
Список pgsql-hackers
Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> writes:
> EXCLUDE probably flows most nicely with the optional USING clause or
> without. My only complaint was that it's a transitive verb, so it seems
> to impart more meaning than it actually can. I doubt anyone would
> actually be more confused in practice, though. If a couple of people
> agree, I'll change it to EXCLUDE.

EXCLUDE sounds good to me.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jeff Davis
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: operator exclusion constraints
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: operator exclusion constraints