Re: operator exclusion constraints

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От David E. Wheeler
Тема Re: operator exclusion constraints
Дата
Msg-id E897E0C9-C8A5-451E-9A42-FA17143F8ECF@kineticode.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: operator exclusion constraints  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Nov 7, 2009, at 11:08 AM, Tom Lane wrote:

>> EXCLUDE probably flows most nicely with the optional USING clause or
>> without. My only complaint was that it's a transitive verb, so it  
>> seems
>> to impart more meaning than it actually can. I doubt anyone would
>> actually be more confused in practice, though. If a couple of people
>> agree, I'll change it to EXCLUDE.
>
> EXCLUDE sounds good to me.

+1

David


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: operator exclusion constraints
Следующее
От: Jeff Davis
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: operator exclusion constraints