Re: operator exclusion constraints
От | Jeff Davis |
---|---|
Тема | Re: operator exclusion constraints |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1257620199.27737.593.camel@jdavis обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: operator exclusion constraints (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: operator exclusion constraints
Re: operator exclusion constraints Re: operator exclusion constraints |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2009-11-06 at 21:23 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Or maybe forget about it and go to EXCLUDE or EXCLUDING? I left it as EXCLUSION for now. "EXCLUDING USING ..." and "EXCLUSIVE USING ..." both sound a little awkward to me. Either could be improved by moving the USING clause around, but that just creates more grammar headaches. EXCLUDE probably flows most nicely with the optional USING clause or without. My only complaint was that it's a transitive verb, so it seems to impart more meaning than it actually can. I doubt anyone would actually be more confused in practice, though. If a couple of people agree, I'll change it to EXCLUDE. Regards,Jeff Davis
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: