Re: BUG #15382: Error create dictionary in pg_dump
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: BUG #15382: Error create dictionary in pg_dump |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 11550.1536859804@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | BUG #15382: Error create dictionary in pg_dump (PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: BUG #15382: Error create dictionary in pg_dump
|
| Список | pgsql-bugs |
=?utf-8?q?PG_Bug_reporting_form?= <noreply@postgresql.org> writes:
> Dump is creates, but have one trouble. Result of using pg_resote command:
> pg_restore: [архиватор (БД)] could not execute query: ОШИБКА (Error):
> словарь текстового поиска (text search dictionary) "ispell_apteka25" не
> существует (not exists)
> Выполнялась команда (running command): CREATE TEXT SEARCH DICTIONARY
> "public"."thesaurus_apteka25" (
> TEMPLATE = "pg_catalog"."thesaurus",
> dictfile = 'apteka25', dictionary = 'ispell_apteka25' );
Yeah, this is a consequence of the security changes we made awhile back
to run dump and restore under restrictive search_path settings. You need
to explicitly schema-qualify that sub-dictionary name, since it isn't in
the pg_catalog schema. Unfortunately, since dictionary parameters are
just strings without a lot of fixed semantics to them, pg_dump can't
really fix this for you --- it doesn't know that that parameter refers
to a database object, or which database object.
> If i change argument dictionary for this note to: dictionary =
> 'public.ispell_apteka25' - it's now ok!
Yup, that's what you have to do. Note that this is a good thing
anyway, independently of pg_dump, because your old definition could
have failed if the thesaurus dictionary were invoked by any
application running under a nondefault search_path.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: