Re: merging advocacy and "overview"

On Thu, 2004-12-02 at 11:57, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> >>>                    members{a}
> >>
> >>
> >> Doesn't this duplicate the developer site portion?
> >>
> >>>                         corporate{a}
> >>
> >>
> >> We'll need to come up with some rules on who can appear here.  My
> >> thoughts:
> >> 1) Anyone who sponsors a full-time or 1/2 time developer;
> >> 2) Anyone who has sponsored a significant feature in the last 3
> >> versions.
> >
> >
> > Not sure if I agree with a 'time limit' on this one ... there should
> > be some sort of 'history' section ... if we are remembering a
> > contribution, it should be remembered, not 'fade out over time' ...
>
>
> I think Marc has an interesting point. The other issue is what about
> companies who may not sponsor a ton of code but troll the mailing lists?
> Or provide major services like hosting? Or secondary code like the .Net
> provider?
>

This is why we never came up with a guideline...

Robert Treat
--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL