Re: generic return for functions

> thing that causes me some minor grief is the fact that currently you
> cannot have default values to function parameters, a feature we use a
> lot.

The default value is used when the parameter is NULL or unprovided?

fn(integer, integer, integer default 32)

select fn(integer, integer); <- Third argument would be '32'?


When PostgreSQL gets named parameters the above probably makes sense to
add.

A TODO item?
--
Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca>

PGP Key: http://www.rbt.ca/rbtpub.asc