Re: generic return for functions

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: generic return for functions
Дата
Msg-id 26866.1054482407@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: generic return for functions  (Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca>)
Ответы Re: generic return for functions  (Avi Schwartz <avi@CFFtechnologies.com>)
Список pgsql-sql
Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca> writes:
>> thing that causes me some minor grief is the fact that currently you=20
>> cannot have default values to function parameters, a feature we use a=20
>> lot.

> fn(integer, integer, integer default 32)
> select fn(integer, integer); <- Third argument would be '32'?
> When PostgreSQL gets named parameters the above probably makes sense to
> add.

> A TODO item?

That isn't ever going to happen.  We have enough difficulty resolving
overloaded functions as it is.  If we couldn't even be sure how many
arguments there were supposed to be, it'd become completely intractable.

You can however achieve similar effects at the user level by adding
auxiliary functions: declare fn(int,int) as a one-line SQL function
that calls fn($1, $2, 32).
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Avi Schwartz
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: generic return for functions
Следующее
От: Avi Schwartz
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: generic return for functions