Re: [HACKERS] Continuous integration on Windows?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andrew Dunstan
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Continuous integration on Windows?
Дата
Msg-id 0e2d457d-b48d-e9ff-afc3-25c19ff0d3e5@2ndQuadrant.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на [HACKERS] Continuous integration on Windows?  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Continuous integration on Windows?  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers

On 10/11/2017 11:04 PM, Thomas Munro wrote:
> Hi hackers,
>
> I don't use Windows myself, but I'd rather avoid submitting patches
> that fail to build, build with horrible warnings or blow up on that
> fine operating system.  I think it would be neat to be able to have
> experimental branches of PostgreSQL built and tested on Windows
> automatically just by pushing them to a watched public git repo.  Just
> like Travis CI and several others do for the major GNU/Linux distros,
> it seems there is at least one Windows-based CI company that
> generously offers free testing to open source projects:
> https://www.appveyor.com (hat tip to Ilmari for the pointer).  I
> wonder... has anyone here with Microsoft know-how ever tried to
> produce an appveyor.yml file that would do a MSVC build and
> check-world?
>


Interesting.

I'm taking a look.

A couple of things not in their pre-built images that we'll need are
flex and bison. We might be able to overcome that with chocolatey, which
is installed, haven't tested yet.

getting a working appveyor.yml will take a little while, though.

cheers

andrew

-- 
Andrew Dunstan                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning
Следующее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning