Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmoZOowOvB_S14LFoD0SzH980Ek1dkcbjkQK7-edKx4gkNA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> Are we going to rely on the the combine function to stay the same
> forever after?

If we change them, it will be a pg_upgrade compatibility break for
anyone using hash-partitioned tables with more than one partitioning
column.  Dump and reload will also break unless
--load-via-partition-root is used.

In other words, it's not utterly fixed in stone --- we invented
--load-via-partition-root primarily to cope with circumstances that
could change hash values --- but we sure don't want to be changing it
with any regularity, or for a less-than-excellent reason.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] oversight in EphemeralNamedRelation support
Следующее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Continuous integration on Windows?