Re: NOTICE vs WARNING

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Christopher Kings-Lynne
Тема Re: NOTICE vs WARNING
Дата
Msg-id 0c7901c36c52$ade65f60$2800a8c0@mars
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: NOTICE vs WARNING  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Ответы Re: NOTICE vs WARNING  (Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> If it were in fact the characteristic of a NOTICE that you need not pay
> attention to them, why do we have them?

I have often wondered that myself.

> > My thought is that you could turn off NOTICES and not worry.
>
> Well, there are plenty of NOTICE instances that carry a definite need to
> worry, such as identifier truncation, implicitly added FROM items,
> implicit changes to types specified as "opaque", unsupported and ignored
> syntax clauses.

I think that WARNING should be used for ALL things that have been
deprecated.  eg. implicit FROM, the opaque business, and definitely
unsupported and ignored synacies.

> I have a slight feeling that these two categories cannot usefully be
> distinguished, but I'm interested to hear other opinions.

Chris



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Marc G. Fournier"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: MHonArc configuration for spam protection
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: NOTICE vs WARNING