Re: Error on CLUSTER command
От | Mark Steben |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Error on CLUSTER command |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 00bf01c86a89$fa4af7a0$14010a0a@dei26g028575 обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Error on CLUSTER command (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Error on CLUSTER command
Re: Error on CLUSTER command |
Список | pgsql-admin |
The doc says to do an initdb and reload the data whenever you run pg_resetxlog. Do you concur with that even if we are only resetting the OID counter? -----Original Message----- From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 11:36 AM To: Mark Steben Cc: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Error on CLUSTER command "Mark Steben" <msteben@autorevenue.com> writes: > The number may change pointing to another index or stay the same. > The error persists if I repeat 3 or 4 times. Usually after the > 4th or 5th time the cluster is successful. Hm. I'd guess that the installation is old enough that the OID counter has wrapped around, and is currently in a region that is pretty densely populated with existing tables. (You could check that out by looking into the database directory.) 7.4.x doesn't have the logic that was added later to skip over filenames that are already in use; instead you just get an error if there's a collision. I forget whether 7.4's pg_resetxlog has an option to set the OID counter, but if it does then a temporary fix is to move the OID counter to some less densely populated range. > What is the risk of performing an upgrade to 7.4.19? Low, but it won't make this particular problem go away. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: