Re: Anyone got time to review an article?
От | Michael Paesold |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Anyone got time to review an article? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 001401c4d18b$eb35d6d0$0a01a8c0@zaphod обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Anyone got time to review an article? (Tom Copeland <tom@infoether.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Anyone got time to review an article?
Re: Anyone got time to review an article? |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Tom Copeland wrote: > This article is up here now: > > http://databasejournal.com/features/postgresql/article.php/3437821 > > Thanks to Merlin Moncure and Robert Bernier for their helpful > suggestions, and long live PostgreSQL! What I found quite irritating is that the forum posts below ("PostgreSQL Forum") are not about PostgreSQL but really MS SQL, i.e. the MS SQL forum is linked into this article. If you look at the available database forums, you will see that there is no PostgreSQL forum (but e.g. a MySQL one). Perhaps you can point that out to the Databasejournal people so the would fix it. I liked your article. Best Regards, Michael Paesold
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: