Обсуждение: FEATURE REQUEST: Role vCPU limit/priority

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка

FEATURE REQUEST: Role vCPU limit/priority

От
Yoni Sade
Дата:
It would be useful to have the ability to define for a role default vCPU affinity limits/thread priority settings so that more active sessions could coexist similar to MySQL resource groups.

Best Regards,
Yoni Sade

Re: FEATURE REQUEST: Role vCPU limit/priority

От
Aleksander Alekseev
Дата:
Hi Yoni,

> It would be useful to have the ability to define for a role default vCPU affinity limits/thread priority settings so
thatmore active sessions could coexist similar to MySQL resource groups.
 

To me this sounds like a valuable feature.

Would you be interested in working on it? Typically it is a good idea
to start with an RFC document and discuss it with the community.

-- 
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev



Re: FEATURE REQUEST: Role vCPU limit/priority

От
Yoni Sade
Дата:
Well, I'm not a developer, I just wanted to pitch this idea as a DBA who would make use of this feature.

Best Regards,
Yoni Sade

‫בתאריך יום ב׳, 22 בינו׳ 2024 ב-12:43 מאת ‪Aleksander Alekseev‬‏ <‪aleksander@timescale.com‬‏>:‬
Hi Yoni,

> It would be useful to have the ability to define for a role default vCPU affinity limits/thread priority settings so that more active sessions could coexist similar to MySQL resource groups.

To me this sounds like a valuable feature.

Would you be interested in working on it? Typically it is a good idea
to start with an RFC document and discuss it with the community.

--
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev

Re: FEATURE REQUEST: Role vCPU limit/priority

От
Thomas Kellerer
Дата:
Yoni Sade schrieb am 21.01.2024 um 19:07:
> It would be useful to have the ability to define for a role default
> vCPU affinity limits/thread priority settings so that more active
> sessions could coexist similar to MySQL resource groups
> <https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/8.0/en/resource-groups.html>.

To a certain extent, you can achieve something like that using Linux cgroups

https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com/en/linux-cgroups-for-postgresql/





Re: FEATURE REQUEST: Role vCPU limit/priority

От
Aleksander Alekseev
Дата:
Hi,

> Well, I'm not a developer, I just wanted to pitch this idea as a DBA who would make use of this feature.

I don't think one shouldn't be a developer in order to write an RFC
and drive its discussion within the community. On top of that I'm
pretty confident as a DBA you can contribute tests and documentation.

-- 
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev



Re: FEATURE REQUEST: Role vCPU limit/priority

От
Andres Freund
Дата:
Hi,

On 2024-01-23 13:09:22 +0100, Thomas Kellerer wrote:
> Yoni Sade schrieb am 21.01.2024 um 19:07:
> > It would be useful to have the ability to define for a role default
> > vCPU affinity limits/thread priority settings so that more active
> > sessions could coexist similar to MySQL resource groups
> > <https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/8.0/en/resource-groups.html>.
> 
> To a certain extent, you can achieve something like that using Linux cgroups
> 
> https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com/en/linux-cgroups-for-postgresql/

If you do that naively, you just run into priority inversion issues. E.g. a
backend holding a critical lwlock not getting scheduled for a while because it
exceeded it CPU allocation, preventing higher priority processes from
progressing.

I doubt you can implement this in a robust manner outside of postgres.

Regards,

Andres



Re: FEATURE REQUEST: Role vCPU limit/priority

От
Bruce Momjian
Дата:
On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 10:10:27AM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 2024-01-23 13:09:22 +0100, Thomas Kellerer wrote:
> > Yoni Sade schrieb am 21.01.2024 um 19:07:
> > > It would be useful to have the ability to define for a role default
> > > vCPU affinity limits/thread priority settings so that more active
> > > sessions could coexist similar to MySQL resource groups
> > > <https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/8.0/en/resource-groups.html>.
> > 
> > To a certain extent, you can achieve something like that using Linux cgroups
> > 
> > https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com/en/linux-cgroups-for-postgresql/
> 
> If you do that naively, you just run into priority inversion issues. E.g. a
> backend holding a critical lwlock not getting scheduled for a while because it
> exceeded it CPU allocation, preventing higher priority processes from
> progressing.
> 
> I doubt you can implement this in a robust manner outside of postgres.

FYI, here is an article about priority inversion:

    https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/priority-inversion-what-the-heck/

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EDB                                      https://enterprisedb.com

  Only you can decide what is important to you.