Обсуждение: BUG #15768: Removed rpms and now require /etc/redhat-release
The following bug has been logged on the website: Bug reference: 15768 Logged by: Matt Harter Email address: matt.harter@genesys.com PostgreSQL version: 10.6 Operating system: Amazon Linux Description: Amazon linux does not have /etc/redhat-release and our pipelines are broken because the repositories we were using to add to yum are no longer there without requiring /etc/redhat-release. We are a CI/CD system so manually adding this is not an option.
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 12:20:45PM +0000, PG Bug reporting form wrote: > The following bug has been logged on the website: > > Bug reference: 15768 > Logged by: Matt Harter > Email address: matt.harter@genesys.com > PostgreSQL version: 10.6 > Operating system: Amazon Linux > Description: > > Amazon linux does not have /etc/redhat-release and our pipelines are broken > because the repositories we were using to add to yum are no longer there > without requiring /etc/redhat-release. We are a CI/CD system so manually > adding this is not an option. Uh, can you show us what you are running and the error? I think this is a packaging issue, but am unsure. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription +
Hi, On Wed, 2019-04-17 at 12:20 +0000, PG Bug reporting form wrote: > Amazon linux does not have /etc/redhat-release and our pipelines are broken > because the repositories we were using to add to yum are no longer there > without requiring /etc/redhat-release. We are a CI/CD system so manually > adding this is not an option. Amazon Linux support was removed years ago actually. I just made sure that our repo file reflects that. Regards, -- Devrim Gündüz Open Source Solution Architect, Red Hat Certified Engineer Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR
Вложения
Well whether or not it is officially supported, it still works on amazon linux, and since their default repositories
arebehind on postgres (which of course is really an amazon limitation) we have to manually add the repository. Since
therecent change that added a required dependency (which is clearly NOT required for amazon linux), our previously
workingdeploy pipelines are now blocked/broken. We have temporarily mitigated the issue by using rpm and explicitly
ignoringthe repositories dependencies, but that seems like a band-aid fix for the real problem which is that dependency
shouldn’tbe there. Why does a repository need to enforce the os it is on? If a consumer wants to do something “wrong”
oragainst the documented way to do things, their issues are their problem.
On 4/18/19, 4:07 AM, "Devrim Gündüz" <devrim@gunduz.org> wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 2019-04-17 at 12:20 +0000, PG Bug reporting form wrote:
> Amazon linux does not have /etc/redhat-release and our pipelines are broken
> because the repositories we were using to add to yum are no longer there
> without requiring /etc/redhat-release. We are a CI/CD system so manually
> adding this is not an option.
Amazon Linux support was removed years ago actually. I just made sure that our
repo file reflects that.
Regards,
--
Devrim Gündüz
Open Source Solution Architect, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR
On 2019-Apr-18, Matt Harter wrote: > Well whether or not it is officially supported, it still works on amazon linux, and since their default repositories arebehind on postgres (which of course is really an amazon limitation) we have to manually add the repository. Since therecent change that added a required dependency (which is clearly NOT required for amazon linux), our previously workingdeploy pipelines are now blocked/broken. We have temporarily mitigated the issue by using rpm and explicitly ignoringthe repositories dependencies, but that seems like a band-aid fix for the real problem which is that dependency shouldn’tbe there. Why does a repository need to enforce the os it is on? If a consumer wants to do something “wrong” oragainst the documented way to do things, their issues are their problem. I agree, and adding such a dep sounds like a strange change to make. What was the rationale for that? -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Hi, On Thu, 2019-04-18 at 11:18 +0000, Matt Harter wrote: > Why does a repository need to enforce the os it is on? I have no intention to support a distro that I never ever test. That means, I enforce what I test. No intention to support Amazon Linux, actually, due to bad experiences in the past. Like I am almost about to drop SLES support for the same reason. Regards, -- Devrim Gündüz Open Source Solution Architect, Red Hat Certified Engineer Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR