Обсуждение: How many billion rows of data I can store in PostgreSQL RDS.
Hello Pgsql-General,
We have currently have around 6 TB of data and have plans to move some historic datainto RDS of about close to 1 TB of data. The total rows in partitioned tables is around 6 billion rows today and have plans to keep the data long term which would be around 5-8 billion rows per year.
So i short my use case is to keep data of 8 billion rows of data every year and store atleast 16 billion of rows for every 2 years.
- How many billion rows does RDS handle ?. This data would be exposed by AP's accessing this data.
Appreciate you reply on this.
Thank you.
On 2/21/19 9:08 PM, github kran wrote: > Hello Pgsql-General, > > We have currently have around 6 TB of data and have plans to move some > historic datainto RDS of about close to 1 TB of data. The total rows in > partitioned tables is around 6 billion rows today and have plans to keep > the data long term which would be around 5-8 billion rows per year. > > So i short my use case is to keep data of 8 billion rows of data every > year and store atleast 16 billion of rows for every 2 years. > > 1. How many billion rows does RDS handle ?. This data would be exposed > by AP's accessing this data. > > Appreciate you reply on this. This would be a question for AWS RDS support. > Thank you. -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 09:14:24PM -0800, Adrian Klaver wrote: > This would be a question for AWS RDS support. And this depends also a lot on your schema, your column alignment and the level of bloat of your relations.. -- Michael
Вложения
Hi all.
Taking advantage of the topic I would like to know the recommendations about how to update to a newer Postgres version having all that amount of data.
Anyone one could share your experience about?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Samuel
Just adding that my case it's not a Amazon RDS, it's common server, if I can say like that...
On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 5:48 AM Samuel Teixeira Santos <arcanosam@gmail.com> wrote:
Just adding that my case it's not a Amazon RDS, it's common server, if I can say like that...
Aplologies I missed the point to mention that this is a question to PostgreSQL community. We are currently using PostgreSQL. ( Aurora Postgres RDS). I want to know what postgresql can handle in terms of limitations.
Thanks.
On 2/22/19 4:46 AM, github kran wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 5:48 AM Samuel Teixeira Santos > <arcanosam@gmail.com <mailto:arcanosam@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Just adding that my case it's not a Amazon RDS, it's common server, > if I can say like that... > > Aplologies I missed the point to mention that this is a question to > PostgreSQL community. We are currently using PostgreSQL. ( Aurora > Postgres RDS). I want to know what postgresql can handle in terms of > limitations. Aurora Postgres is a fork of the community version: https://aws.amazon.com/rds/aurora/ "Amazon Aurora is a MySQL and PostgreSQL-compatible relational database built for the cloud, ..." You will need to ask the folks that created the fork(AWS) what it's capabilities are. > > Thanks. -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@aklaver.com