Обсуждение: pgadmin3 on macOS "Mojave"
Hello,
I recently upgraded my Mac to the latest version of macOS. Now, when I run pgadmin3, I get a message that it needs to be recompiled, apparently for 64bit.
Is there a plan to rebuild pgadmin3 for macOS Mojave?
I know you’re rather bullish on #4, but it still isn’t up the the usability and usefullness of pgadmin3. It would be great to have the working pgadmin rebuilt for 64 bits while we wait for #4 to mature.
(And, yes, pgadmin3 is indeed getting a bit long in the tooth, but it is still vastly more performant, and a much better UI than pgdamin4. #4 is pretty, though.)
On Nov 5, 2018, at 8:50 AM, Bill Evans <bill@literacybridge.org> wrote:Hello,I recently upgraded my Mac to the latest version of macOS. Now, when I run pgadmin3, I get a message that it needs to be recompiled, apparently for 64bit.Is there a plan to rebuild pgadmin3 for macOS Mojave?I know you’re rather bullish on #4, but it still isn’t up the the usability and usefullness of pgadmin3. It would be great to have the working pgadmin rebuilt for 64 bits while we wait for #4 to mature.(And, yes, pgadmin3 is indeed getting a bit long in the tooth, but it is still vastly more performant, and a much better UI than pgdamin4. #4 is pretty, though.)
+1 - thanks for the heads-up, Bill. I was just about to upgrade, but I guess I’ll hold off until they respond to this request.On Nov 5, 2018, at 8:50 AM, Bill Evans <bill@literacybridge.org> wrote:Hello,I recently upgraded my Mac to the latest version of macOS. Now, when I run pgadmin3, I get a message that it needs to be recompiled, apparently for 64bit.Is there a plan to rebuild pgadmin3 for macOS Mojave?I know you’re rather bullish on #4, but it still isn’t up the the usability and usefullness of pgadmin3. It would be great to have the working pgadmin rebuilt for 64 bits while we wait for #4 to mature.(And, yes, pgadmin3 is indeed getting a bit long in the tooth, but it is still vastly more performant, and a much better UI than pgdamin4. #4 is pretty, though.)
Look after your data, and your database will look after you. -- Simon Riggs
Sheldon E. Strauch
Data Architect, Data Services
O 312-676-1556
M 224-723-3878
Enova International, Inc.
This transmission is confidential and may be privileged or proprietary. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to use the information in this transmission in any way. Please inform the sender immediately if you have received this transmission in error and permanently delete and destroy the original and any copies of the information.
One addition:
- Pgadmin3 works fine on macOS Mojave. But it will not run at all on some future version of macOS. Safe to upgrade; the message is annoying at worst. (But it is a bit annoying.)
Best,
-bill
From: "Strauch, Sheldon" <sstrauch@enova.com>
Date: Monday, November 5, 2018 at 10:05 AM
To: <jackrg@pobox.com>
Cc: <bill@literacybridge.org>, <pgadmin-support@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: pgadmin3 on macOS "Mojave"
+1 I too will wait to upgrade Mac OSX until we hear further.
On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 11:47 AM Jack Royal-Gordon <jackrg@pobox.com> wrote:
+1 - thanks for the heads-up, Bill. I was just about to upgrade, but I guess I’ll hold off until they respond to this request.
On Nov 5, 2018, at 8:50 AM, Bill Evans <bill@literacybridge.org> wrote:
Hello,
I recently upgraded my Mac to the latest version of macOS. Now, when I run pgadmin3, I get a message that it needs to be recompiled, apparently for 64bit.
Is there a plan to rebuild pgadmin3 for macOS Mojave?
I know you’re rather bullish on #4, but it still isn’t up the the usability and usefullness of pgadmin3. It would be great to have the working pgadmin rebuilt for 64 bits while we wait for #4 to mature.
(And, yes, pgadmin3 is indeed getting a bit long in the tooth, but it is still vastly more performant, and a much better UI than pgdamin4. #4 is pretty, though.)
--
Look after your data, and your database will look after you. -- Simon Riggs
Sheldon E. Strauch
Data Architect, Data Services
O 312-676-1556
M 224-723-3878
Enova International, Inc.
This transmission is confidential and may be privileged or proprietary. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to use the information in this transmission in any way. Please inform the sender immediately if you have received this transmission in error and permanently delete and destroy the original and any copies of the information.
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK:http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
+1 - thanks for the heads-up, Bill. I was just about to upgrade, but I guess I’ll hold off until they respond to this request.On Nov 5, 2018, at 8:50 AM, Bill Evans <bill@literacybridge.org> wrote:Hello,I recently upgraded my Mac to the latest version of macOS. Now, when I run pgadmin3, I get a message that it needs to be recompiled, apparently for 64bit.Is there a plan to rebuild pgadmin3 for macOS Mojave?I know you’re rather bullish on #4, but it still isn’t up the the usability and usefullness of pgadmin3. It would be great to have the working pgadmin rebuilt for 64 bits while we wait for #4 to mature.(And, yes, pgadmin3 is indeed getting a bit long in the tooth, but it is still vastly more performant, and a much better UI than pgdamin4. #4 is pretty, though.)
On Nov 5, 2018, at 10:25 AM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:Updating to 64bit would require a huge amount of work to first get the code working properly with wxWidgets 3, and then to move to Cocoa rather than Carbon.It’s not a good use of time given how unmaintainable (and out of date) that code has become - it’s definitely not something I have time to do I’m afraid. Time would be far better spend filling the remaining gaps in pgAdmin 4 (whatever they are - we’ve addressed the majority that were reported).--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK:http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company+1 - thanks for the heads-up, Bill. I was just about to upgrade, but I guess I’ll hold off until they respond to this request.On Nov 5, 2018, at 8:50 AM, Bill Evans <bill@literacybridge.org> wrote:Hello,I recently upgraded my Mac to the latest version of macOS. Now, when I run pgadmin3, I get a message that it needs to be recompiled, apparently for 64bit.Is there a plan to rebuild pgadmin3 for macOS Mojave?I know you’re rather bullish on #4, but it still isn’t up the the usability and usefullness of pgadmin3. It would be great to have the working pgadmin rebuilt for 64 bits while we wait for #4 to mature.(And, yes, pgadmin3 is indeed getting a bit long in the tooth, but it is still vastly more performant, and a much better UI than pgdamin4. #4 is pretty, though.)
Doug Easterbrook
On Nov 5, 2018, at 11:33 AM, Jack Royal-Gordon <jackrg@pobox.com> wrote:Hi Dave,Understood. I don’t think anyone expects you do that much work; I think we were just expecting/hoping it would be a recompile with a different switch sort of thing.JackOn Nov 5, 2018, at 10:25 AM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:Updating to 64bit would require a huge amount of work to first get the code working properly with wxWidgets 3, and then to move to Cocoa rather than Carbon.It’s not a good use of time given how unmaintainable (and out of date) that code has become - it’s definitely not something I have time to do I’m afraid. Time would be far better spend filling the remaining gaps in pgAdmin 4 (whatever they are - we’ve addressed the majority that were reported).--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK:http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company+1 - thanks for the heads-up, Bill. I was just about to upgrade, but I guess I’ll hold off until they respond to this request.On Nov 5, 2018, at 8:50 AM, Bill Evans <bill@literacybridge.org> wrote:Hello,I recently upgraded my Mac to the latest version of macOS. Now, when I run pgadmin3, I get a message that it needs to be recompiled, apparently for 64bit.Is there a plan to rebuild pgadmin3 for macOS Mojave?I know you’re rather bullish on #4, but it still isn’t up the the usability and usefullness of pgadmin3. It would be great to have the working pgadmin rebuilt for 64 bits while we wait for #4 to mature.(And, yes, pgadmin3 is indeed getting a bit long in the tooth, but it is still vastly more performant, and a much better UI than pgdamin4. #4 is pretty, though.)
Mojave is just saying that the NEXT MacOS version coming out in a year will require 64bit apps. This is a nag. But if you want to keep using PgAdmin3, Apple will still be releasing security updates for Mojave for the next 3 years so you have that long to still be fully patched with it. -- Darren Duncan On 2018-11-05 8:50 AM, Bill Evans wrote: > Hello, > > I recently upgraded my Mac to the latest version of macOS. Now, when I run > pgadmin3, I get a message that it needs to be recompiled, apparently for 64bit. > > Is there a plan to rebuild pgadmin3 for macOS Mojave? > > I know you’re rather bullish on #4, but it still isn’t up the the usability and > usefullness of pgadmin3. It would be great to have the working pgadmin rebuilt > for 64 bits while we wait for #4 to mature. > > (And, yes, pgadmin3 is indeed getting a bit long in the tooth, but it is still > vastly more performant, and a much better UI than pgdamin4. #4 is pretty, though.) >
well. where there is a will, there is a way.Pgadmin 3 is open sourcethe people over a tbigSQL have compiled it for Postgres 10 — and so most of the error messages srtrting the legacy pagadmin 3.2 have been taken out of it.It doesn’t work for postgres 11 - since the libpq.dll is probably too old,.anyway, I’ve been using that ,for months, along with pgadmin 4.its a little harder to find it on the bigsql web site — I don’t use their postgres distribution (I use enterprize db’s).but it work on mojave, no error messages. Its not 64 bit, but at this time, who cares.Its just nice that it works with postgres 10.
Doug EasterbrookArts Management Systems Ltd.Phone (403) 650-1978On Nov 5, 2018, at 11:33 AM, Jack Royal-Gordon <jackrg@pobox.com> wrote:Hi Dave,Understood. I don’t think anyone expects you do that much work; I think we were just expecting/hoping it would be a recompile with a different switch sort of thing.JackOn Nov 5, 2018, at 10:25 AM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:Updating to 64bit would require a huge amount of work to first get the code working properly with wxWidgets 3, and then to move to Cocoa rather than Carbon.It’s not a good use of time given how unmaintainable (and out of date) that code has become - it’s definitely not something I have time to do I’m afraid. Time would be far better spend filling the remaining gaps in pgAdmin 4 (whatever they are - we’ve addressed the majority that were reported).--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK:http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company+1 - thanks for the heads-up, Bill. I was just about to upgrade, but I guess I’ll hold off until they respond to this request.On Nov 5, 2018, at 8:50 AM, Bill Evans <bill@literacybridge.org> wrote:Hello,I recently upgraded my Mac to the latest version of macOS. Now, when I run pgadmin3, I get a message that it needs to be recompiled, apparently for 64bit.Is there a plan to rebuild pgadmin3 for macOS Mojave?I know you’re rather bullish on #4, but it still isn’t up the the usability and usefullness of pgadmin3. It would be great to have the working pgadmin rebuilt for 64 bits while we wait for #4 to mature.(And, yes, pgadmin3 is indeed getting a bit long in the tooth, but it is still vastly more performant, and a much better UI than pgdamin4. #4 is pretty, though.)
Look after your data, and your database will look after you. -- Simon Riggs
Sheldon E. Strauch
Data Architect, Data Services
O 312-676-1556
M 224-723-3878
Enova International, Inc.
This transmission is confidential and may be privileged or proprietary. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to use the information in this transmission in any way. Please inform the sender immediately if you have received this transmission in error and permanently delete and destroy the original and any copies of the information.