Обсуждение: What is the accepted practice to automate initdb (PostgreSQL 9.6) toa non-default directory?
What is the accepted practice to automate initdb (PostgreSQL 9.6) toa non-default directory?
Redirecting to /bin/systemctl start postgresql.service
Job for postgresql.service failed because the control process exited with error code. See "systemctl status postgresql.service" and "journalctl -xe" for details.
When I run systemctl status postgresql.service -l
it reports:● postgresql.service - PostgreSQL database server Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/postgresql.service; disabled; vendor preset: disabled) Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Thu 2018-03-01 05:41:09 UTC; 2min 8s ago Process: 3196 ExecStartPre=/usr/libexec/postgresql-check-db-dir %N (code=exited, status=1/FAILURE)
Mar 01 05:41:09 ip-172-31-31-191.us-west-2.compute.internal systemd[1]: Starting PostgreSQL database server...
Mar 01 05:41:09 ip-172-31-31-191.us-west-2.compute.internal postgresql-check-db-dir[3196]: Directory "/var/lib/pgsql/data" is missing or empty.
Mar 01 05:41:09 ip-172-31-31-191.us-west-2.compute.internal postgresql-check-db-dir[3196]: Use "/usr/bin/postgresql-setup --initdb"
Mar 01 05:41:09 ip-172-31-31-191.us-west-2.compute.internal postgresql-check-db-dir[3196]: to initialize the database cluster.
Mar 01 05:41:09 ip-172-31-31-191.us-west-2.compute.internal postgresql-check-db-dir[3196]: See /usr/share/doc/postgresql-9.6.6/README.rpm-dist for more information.
Mar 01 05:41:09 ip-172-31-31-191.us-west-2.compute.internal systemd[1]: postgresql.service: control process exited, code=exited status=1
Mar 01 05:41:09 ip-172-31-31-191.us-west-2.compute.internal systemd[1]: Failed to start PostgreSQL database server.
Mar 01 05:41:09 ip-172-31-31-191.us-west-2.compute.internal systemd[1]: Unit postgresql.service entered failed state.
Mar 01 05:41:09 ip-172-31-31-191.us-west-2.compute.internal systemd[1]: postgresql.service failed.
sudo ls -la /var/lib/pgsql/data
it reports:total 0
drwx------ 2 postgres postgres 6 Dec 11 21:42 .
drwx------ 4 postgres postgres 54 Feb 25 21:38 ..
$ sudo ls -la /databases
total 52
drwx------ 19 postgres postgres 4096 Mar 2 16:33 .
dr-xr-xr-x 19 root root 274 Mar 2 16:33 ..
drwx------ 5 postgres postgres 41 Mar 2 16:33 base
drwx------ 2 postgres postgres 4096 Mar 2 16:33 global
drwx------ 2 postgres postgres 18 Mar 2 16:33 pg_clog
drwx------ 2 postgres postgres 6 Mar 2 16:33 pg_commit_ts
drwx------ 2 postgres postgres 6 Mar 2 16:33 pg_dynshmem
-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 4468 Mar 2 16:33 pg_hba.conf
-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 1636 Mar 2 16:33 pg_ident.conf
drwx------ 4 postgres postgres 39 Mar 2 16:33 pg_logical
drwx------ 4 postgres postgres 36 Mar 2 16:33 pg_multixact
drwx------ 2 postgres postgres 18 Mar 2 16:33 pg_notify
drwx------ 2 postgres postgres 6 Mar 2 16:33 pg_replslot
drwx------ 2 postgres postgres 6 Mar 2 16:33 pg_serial
drwx------ 2 postgres postgres 6 Mar 2 16:33 pg_snapshots
drwx------ 2 postgres postgres 6 Mar 2 16:33 pg_stat
drwx------ 2 postgres postgres 6 Mar 2 16:33 pg_stat_tmp
drwx------ 2 postgres postgres 18 Mar 2 16:33 pg_subtrans
drwx------ 2 postgres postgres 6 Mar 2 16:33 pg_tblspc
drwx------ 2 postgres postgres 6 Mar 2 16:33 pg_twophase
-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 4 Mar 2 16:33 PG_VERSION
drwx------ 3 postgres postgres 60 Mar 2 16:33 pg_xlog
-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 88 Mar 2 16:33 postgresql.auto.conf
-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 22301 Mar 2 16:33 postgresql.conf
Mike Lonergan <mikethecanuck@gmail.com> writes: > The internet has the following pattern documented in many places (with > varying install locations for "initdb", but always the same command) > through at least PostgreSQL 9.3: > sudo -u postgres postgres /opt/pg/bin/initdb -D /data/ > However while this command can complete successfully (which is encouraging, > as it's still documented in the 9.6 docs > <https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/app-initdb.html>), running sudo > postgresql service start results in: > Redirecting to /bin/systemctl start postgresql.service > Job for postgresql.service failed because the control process exited > with error code. See "systemctl status postgresql.service" and > "journalctl -xe" for details. Evidently you're relying on somebody's systemd unit script to launch Postgres. Almost certainly, that unit script has the location of the data directory hard-wired into it. If you want to use a non-default directory location, you'll have to change the unit script (and possibly then mutter some incantation to get systemd to notice you've changed it; I've not worked with systemd in awhile so I forget). > The recommended command "postgresql-setup --initdb" doesn't seem to accept > -D or --pgdata parameters, so that seems a non-starter for my scenario. While it's certainly possible to use a manual invocation of initdb to get things going, when your distro provides a wrapper like postgresql-setup you're better off using that, because it's certain to get the data directory location, ownership, etc set up the way the launch script expects. The reason there's no -D option is that it scrapes the datadir location out of the launch script; again, you *must* change that script if you're going to use this launch method. > I've seen various unofficial solutions that use various combinations of > manual setup and hand-editing of .conf files, and I'm trying hard to avoid > that so that my ops team can build and rebuild this server in an emergency > situation without any special knowledge of the behaviour of PostgreSQL or > its tools. If that's what you're striving for, then the very first recommendation would be to *not* use a non-default data dir location, but just go along with what the distro wants to do out-of-the-box. You're just adding another layer of complexity and things-to-go-wrong. (An example of the sort of thing I'm worried about is that you're likely also going to need to have a conversation with SELinux about whether the postgres daemon is allowed to use files in the nonstandard location. It's doable, certainly, but it's one more thing to configure.) regards, tom lane
Mike Lonergan <mikethecanuck@gmail.com> writes:
> The internet has the following pattern documented in many places (with
> varying install locations for "initdb", but always the same command)
> through at least PostgreSQL 9.3:
> sudo -u postgres postgres /opt/pg/bin/initdb -D /data/
> However while this command can complete successfully (which is encouraging,
> as it's still documented in the 9.6 docs
> <https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/app-initdb. html>), running sudo
> postgresql service start results in:
> Redirecting to /bin/systemctl start postgresql.service
> Job for postgresql.service failed because the control process exited
> with error code. See "systemctl status postgresql.service" and
> "journalctl -xe" for details.
Evidently you're relying on somebody's systemd unit script to launch
Postgres. Almost certainly, that unit script has the location of the
data directory hard-wired into it. If you want to use a non-default
directory location, you'll have to change the unit script (and possibly
then mutter some incantation to get systemd to notice you've changed
it; I've not worked with systemd in awhile so I forget).
> The recommended command "postgresql-setup --initdb" doesn't seem to accept
> -D or --pgdata parameters, so that seems a non-starter for my scenario.
While it's certainly possible to use a manual invocation of initdb
to get things going, when your distro provides a wrapper like
postgresql-setup you're better off using that, because it's certain
to get the data directory location, ownership, etc set up the way
the launch script expects. The reason there's no -D option is that
it scrapes the datadir location out of the launch script; again,
you *must* change that script if you're going to use this launch
method.
> I've seen various unofficial solutions that use various combinations of
> manual setup and hand-editing of .conf files, and I'm trying hard to avoid
> that so that my ops team can build and rebuild this server in an emergency
> situation without any special knowledge of the behaviour of PostgreSQL or
> its tools.
If that's what you're striving for, then the very first recommendation
would be to *not* use a non-default data dir location, but just go along
with what the distro wants to do out-of-the-box. You're just adding
another layer of complexity and things-to-go-wrong. (An example of
the sort of thing I'm worried about is that you're likely also going to
need to have a conversation with SELinux about whether the postgres
daemon is allowed to use files in the nonstandard location. It's doable,
certainly, but it's one more thing to configure.)
regards, tom lane
Re: What is the accepted practice to automate initdb (PostgreSQL 9.6)to a non-default directory?
I'll definitely look into the launch script, see what I can do there. Any other thoughts folks have would be more than welcome.
I'll definitely look into the launch script, see what I can do there. Any other thoughts folks have would be more than welcome.This recent Planet PostgreSQL link seems worth a read.David J.
David, thank you as well - that article is fantastic. I'll give this a whirl, but on its face it looks like exactly the solution we're after. That approach to embedded the env var for the service is new to me - addresses a complete blank in my knowledge.Thanks!MikeOn 2 March 2018 at 16:13, David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote:I'll definitely look into the launch script, see what I can do there. Any other thoughts folks have would be more than welcome.This recent Planet PostgreSQL link seems worth a read.David J.