Обсуждение: Searching 9.3beta documentation does not work
No idea if this is a known limitation in the beta-releases but using the website search interface while viewing the "without comments" documentation for 9.3 at http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/static/index.html gives: "Your search for collation returned no hits" for the handful of search terms that I tried to use. Doing the same while viewing 9.2 indeed gives search results as expected. David J. -- View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Searching-9-3beta-documentation-does-not-work-tp5766583.html Sent from the PostgreSQL - www mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 08/06/2013 03:37 PM, David Johnston wrote: > No idea if this is a known limitation in the beta-releases but using the > website search interface while viewing the "without comments" documentation > for 9.3 at > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/static/index.html > > gives: "Your search for collation returned no hits" > > for the handful of search terms that I tried to use. > > Doing the same while viewing 9.2 indeed gives search results as expected. Yeah, we generally don't build the search files for beta versions. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 6:14 AM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: > On 08/06/2013 03:37 PM, David Johnston wrote: >> No idea if this is a known limitation in the beta-releases but using the >> website search interface while viewing the "without comments" documentation >> for 9.3 at >> >> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/static/index.html >> >> gives: "Your search for collation returned no hits" >> >> for the handful of search terms that I tried to use. >> >> Doing the same while viewing 9.2 indeed gives search results as expected. > > Yeah, we generally don't build the search files for beta versions. "Search files" is an interesting term to use, but other than that, that's correct. I have an open ticket for modifying the system so it doesn't actually create a search box on those pages, since that indicates that they would be searchable. -- Magnus HaganderMe: http://www.hagander.net/Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
Le lundi 12 août 2013 15:51:51, Magnus Hagander a écrit : > On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 6:14 AM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: > > On 08/06/2013 03:37 PM, David Johnston wrote: > >> No idea if this is a known limitation in the beta-releases but using the > >> website search interface while viewing the "without comments" > >> documentation for 9.3 at > >> > >> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/static/index.html > >> > >> gives: "Your search for collation returned no hits" > >> > >> for the handful of search terms that I tried to use. > >> > >> Doing the same while viewing 9.2 indeed gives search results as > >> expected. > > > > Yeah, we generally don't build the search files for beta versions. > > "Search files" is an interesting term to use, but other than that, > that's correct. I have an open ticket for modifying the system so it > doesn't actually create a search box on those pages, since that > indicates that they would be searchable. and what about have those searchable too? is it hard to refresh the devel documenation when sgml is modified ? -- Cédric Villemain +33 (0)6 20 30 22 52 http://2ndQuadrant.fr/ PostgreSQL: Support 24x7 - Développement, Expertise et Formation
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 6:32 PM, Cédric Villemain <cedric@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Le lundi 12 août 2013 15:51:51, Magnus Hagander a écrit : >> On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 6:14 AM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: >> > On 08/06/2013 03:37 PM, David Johnston wrote: >> >> No idea if this is a known limitation in the beta-releases but using the >> >> website search interface while viewing the "without comments" >> >> documentation for 9.3 at >> >> >> >> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/static/index.html >> >> >> >> gives: "Your search for collation returned no hits" >> >> >> >> for the handful of search terms that I tried to use. >> >> >> >> Doing the same while viewing 9.2 indeed gives search results as >> >> expected. >> > >> > Yeah, we generally don't build the search files for beta versions. >> >> "Search files" is an interesting term to use, but other than that, >> that's correct. I have an open ticket for modifying the system so it >> doesn't actually create a search box on those pages, since that >> indicates that they would be searchable. > > and what about have those searchable too? is it hard to refresh the devel > documenation when sgml is modified ? Not really, but right now that would put them on google as well, and we don't want people to get devel docs hits as their default hits off google. Incidentally, I believe there is a separate ticket for separating those two things into separate settings :) -- Magnus HaganderMe: http://www.hagander.net/Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
Le lundi 12 août 2013 18:38:06, Magnus Hagander a écrit : > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 6:32 PM, Cédric Villemain > > <cedric@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > Le lundi 12 août 2013 15:51:51, Magnus Hagander a écrit : > >> On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 6:14 AM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: > >> > On 08/06/2013 03:37 PM, David Johnston wrote: > >> >> No idea if this is a known limitation in the beta-releases but using > >> >> the website search interface while viewing the "without comments" > >> >> documentation for 9.3 at > >> >> > >> >> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/static/index.html > >> >> > >> >> gives: "Your search for collation returned no hits" > >> >> > >> >> for the handful of search terms that I tried to use. > >> >> > >> >> Doing the same while viewing 9.2 indeed gives search results as > >> >> expected. > >> > > >> > Yeah, we generally don't build the search files for beta versions. > >> > >> "Search files" is an interesting term to use, but other than that, > >> that's correct. I have an open ticket for modifying the system so it > >> doesn't actually create a search box on those pages, since that > >> indicates that they would be searchable. > > > > and what about have those searchable too? is it hard to refresh the devel > > documenation when sgml is modified ? > > Not really, but right now that would put them on google as well, and > we don't want people to get devel docs hits as their default hits off > google. not if we tell it (google) not to do so, but I understand the point. > Incidentally, I believe there is a separate ticket for separating > those two things into separate settings :) ok -- Cédric Villemain +33 (0)6 20 30 22 52 http://2ndQuadrant.fr/ PostgreSQL: Support 24x7 - Développement, Expertise et Formation
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Cédric Villemain <cedric@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Le lundi 12 août 2013 18:38:06, Magnus Hagander a écrit : >> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 6:32 PM, Cédric Villemain >> >> <cedric@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> > Le lundi 12 août 2013 15:51:51, Magnus Hagander a écrit : >> >> On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 6:14 AM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: >> >> > On 08/06/2013 03:37 PM, David Johnston wrote: >> >> >> No idea if this is a known limitation in the beta-releases but using >> >> >> the website search interface while viewing the "without comments" >> >> >> documentation for 9.3 at >> >> >> >> >> >> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/static/index.html >> >> >> >> >> >> gives: "Your search for collation returned no hits" >> >> >> >> >> >> for the handful of search terms that I tried to use. >> >> >> >> >> >> Doing the same while viewing 9.2 indeed gives search results as >> >> >> expected. >> >> > >> >> > Yeah, we generally don't build the search files for beta versions. >> >> >> >> "Search files" is an interesting term to use, but other than that, >> >> that's correct. I have an open ticket for modifying the system so it >> >> doesn't actually create a search box on those pages, since that >> >> indicates that they would be searchable. >> > >> > and what about have those searchable too? is it hard to refresh the devel >> > documenation when sgml is modified ? >> >> Not really, but right now that would put them on google as well, and >> we don't want people to get devel docs hits as their default hits off >> google. > > not if we tell it (google) not to do so, but I understand the point. > >> Incidentally, I believe there is a separate ticket for separating >> those two things into separate settings :) > > ok This has now been fixed, and beta version docs are searchable as well. Devel versions will be searchable on our own site once the indexes fully refresh. -- Magnus HaganderMe: http://www.hagander.net/Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
Le samedi 17 août 2013 16:33:55 Magnus Hagander a écrit : > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Cédric Villemain > > <cedric@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > Le lundi 12 août 2013 18:38:06, Magnus Hagander a écrit : > >> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 6:32 PM, Cédric Villemain > >> > >> <cedric@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > >> > Le lundi 12 août 2013 15:51:51, Magnus Hagander a écrit : > >> >> On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 6:14 AM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: > >> >> > On 08/06/2013 03:37 PM, David Johnston wrote: > >> >> >> No idea if this is a known limitation in the beta-releases but > >> >> >> using > >> >> >> the website search interface while viewing the "without comments" > >> >> >> documentation for 9.3 at > >> >> >> > >> >> >> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/static/index.html > >> >> >> > >> >> >> gives: "Your search for collation returned no hits" > >> >> >> > >> >> >> for the handful of search terms that I tried to use. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Doing the same while viewing 9.2 indeed gives search results as > >> >> >> expected. > >> >> > > >> >> > Yeah, we generally don't build the search files for beta versions. > >> >> > >> >> "Search files" is an interesting term to use, but other than that, > >> >> that's correct. I have an open ticket for modifying the system so it > >> >> doesn't actually create a search box on those pages, since that > >> >> indicates that they would be searchable. > >> > > >> > and what about have those searchable too? is it hard to refresh the > >> > devel > >> > documenation when sgml is modified ? > >> > >> Not really, but right now that would put them on google as well, and > >> we don't want people to get devel docs hits as their default hits off > >> google. > > > > not if we tell it (google) not to do so, but I understand the point. > > > >> Incidentally, I believe there is a separate ticket for separating > >> those two things into separate settings :) > > > > ok > > This has now been fixed, and beta version docs are searchable as well. > Devel versions will be searchable on our own site once the indexes > fully refresh. Great! it works well, thank you. -- Cédric Villemain +33 (0)6 20 30 22 52 http://2ndQuadrant.fr/ PostgreSQL: Support 24x7 - Développement, Expertise et Formation