Обсуждение: Re: [HACKERS] \dF wrt text search
On Sunday 02 September 2007 10:29, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> writes:
> > postgres=# \dF
> > Did not find any relation named "F".
>
> Works for me. When did you last recompile psql?
>
Blah.... I compiled last night, using the latest snapshot in the
postgresql/dev/ directory in ftp, which, as I look now, has a date listed of
2007-08-10, and looking in the source the catversion is 200702251, which is
before the tsearch bits hit the tree. So, I think my problems lie in the
snapshot no longer being updated :-\ CCing www in case someone wants to fix
it.
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> writes:
> Blah.... I compiled last night, using the latest snapshot in the
> postgresql/dev/ directory in ftp, which, as I look now, has a date listed of
> 2007-08-10, and looking in the source the catversion is 200702251, which is
> before the tsearch bits hit the tree. So, I think my problems lie in the
> snapshot no longer being updated :-\ CCing www in case someone wants to fix
> it.
I'll bet a dollar it got broken in the master-CVS-server move.
regards, tom lane
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Should be fixed now, running a manual run of it right now, give it about 15
minutes or so ...
- --On Sunday, September 02, 2007 21:48:36 -0400 Robert Treat
<xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> On Sunday 02 September 2007 10:29, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> writes:
>> > postgres=# \dF
>> > Did not find any relation named "F".
>>
>> Works for me. When did you last recompile psql?
>>
>
> Blah.... I compiled last night, using the latest snapshot in the
> postgresql/dev/ directory in ftp, which, as I look now, has a date listed of
> 2007-08-10, and looking in the source the catversion is 200702251, which is
> before the tsearch bits hit the tree. So, I think my problems lie in the
> snapshot no longer being updated :-\ CCing www in case someone wants to fix
> it.
>
> --
> Robert Treat
> Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
- ----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFG228F4QvfyHIvDvMRAoYrAJ0b3cg+Jp0lKI6dw2nkQuwoIpE6XwCfQYEG
6EZdIJghysELcvIrdtoisV8=
=EXzk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 09:57:16PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> writes: > > Blah.... I compiled last night, using the latest snapshot in the > > postgresql/dev/ directory in ftp, which, as I look now, has a date listed of > > 2007-08-10, and looking in the source the catversion is 200702251, which is > > before the tsearch bits hit the tree. So, I think my problems lie in the > > snapshot no longer being updated :-\ CCing www in case someone wants to fix > > it. > > I'll bet a dollar it got broken in the master-CVS-server move. I thought it worked off the same cvs repo as the cvsweb stuff (on svr1), which AFAIK isn't broken (since cvsweb works). But it's not documented anywhere, and I do recall not being able to track down exactly how it worked, so I won't be able to proove it to the point of being able to collect that dollar ;-) //Magnus
On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 11:18:45PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > Should be fixed now, running a manual run of it right now, give it about 15 > minutes or so ... Is there now monitoring for it as well? -- Decibel!, aka Jim Nasby decibel@decibel.org EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)
Decibel! wrote: > On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 11:18:45PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: >> Should be fixed now, running a manual run of it right now, give it about 15 >> minutes or so ... > > Is there now monitoring for it as well? yes Stefan