Обсуждение: 7.1RC1 regression results: anyone want them ?

I have built and run "gmake check" on OpenBSD 2.8-stable (i386) and all
appears well. I tried a cursury glance through the docs to see if there was
a suitable place and instructions for regression tests, but I found none.

Anyone want them ?

I would like to see OpenBSD in the supported platforms list.

--
Peter Galbavy
Knowledge Matters Ltd.
http://www.knowledge.com/

> I have built and run "gmake check" on OpenBSD 2.8-stable (i386) and all
> appears well. I tried a cursury glance through the docs to see if there was
> a suitable place and instructions for regression tests, but I found none.
> Anyone want them ?

Yes!

> I would like to see OpenBSD in the supported platforms list.

It is there for the upcoming release, as of a few days ago. But
confirmation that it works for more than one tester is very important,
so thanks for the report.

                      - Thomas

> It is there for the upcoming release, as of a few days ago. But
> confirmation that it works for more than one tester is very important,
> so thanks for the report.

You are welcome. On thinking about it, the only slight problem was that the
default max procs per user (64) was too few and I had to up it to 128 for
the "gmake check" to complete.

I may be able to test OpenBSD/sparc but only after the 7.1 release - what I
mean is more than a few weeks.

Peter

> You are welcome. On thinking about it, the only slight problem was that the
> default max procs per user (64) was too few and I had to up it to 128 for
> the "gmake check" to complete.

That is in the "tuning" category, so I won't bother mentioning it in the
one liner summary.

> I may be able to test OpenBSD/sparc but only after the 7.1 release - what I
> mean is more than a few weeks.

Great! Do you happen to know anyone who could test earlier? Just asking;
at this time of the release cycle I get unreasonably focused on getting
our "platform scorecard" higher ;)

                       - Thomas

Peter Galbavy writes:

> You are welcome. On thinking about it, the only slight problem was that the
> default max procs per user (64) was too few and I had to up it to 128 for
> the "gmake check" to complete.

There is some documentation about this here

http://www.postgresql.org/devel-corner/docs/postgres/kernel-resources.html#AEN12974

but I can see how this could be hard to find offhand.

--
Peter Eisentraut      peter_e@gmx.net       http://yi.org/peter-e/