Обсуждение: ODBC version and Unicode
Dave, in the release of 07.03.0209 you said that you consider ODBC version 0x0300 and Unicode on to be the only supported variant of the driver from now on. The Unix build still builds the 0x0250 and Unicode off version by default. I assume all this conditional code should be fixed and removed? The 0x0300 variant doesn't even build successfully currently.
> -----Original Message----- > From: pgsql-odbc-owner@postgresql.org > [mailto:pgsql-odbc-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Peter Eisentraut > Sent: 10 July 2004 23:37 > To: pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org > Subject: [ODBC] ODBC version and Unicode > > Dave, > > in the release of 07.03.0209 you said that you consider ODBC > version 0x0300 and Unicode on to be the only supported > variant of the driver from now on. Hi Peter, Yes, we've had the 0x0300 Unicode version as a beta for a few releases now - it's had about as much exposure as it's gonna get without being made the only supported version. > The Unix build still > builds the 0x0250 and Unicode off version by default. I > assume all this conditional code should be fixed and removed? > The 0x0300 variant doesn't even build successfully currently. Yes, I've been meaning to throw that one out to the list to see if one of our recent volunteers wants to take a look at it (unless you particularly want to do it?). Regards, Dave.
Dave Page wrote: > > The Unix build still > > builds the 0x0250 and Unicode off version by default. I > > assume all this conditional code should be fixed and removed? > > The 0x0300 variant doesn't even build successfully currently. > > Yes, I've been meaning to throw that one out to the list to see if > one of our recent volunteers wants to take a look at it (unless you > particularly want to do it?). I've made Unicode and 0x0300 the default on Unix as well and fixed the few compilation problems. If there are no problems we can work on untying all this conditional code a bit. Are there any implications of having only a 0x0300 driver available? For example, the JDBC people build various versions of the driver because dfiferent run-time environments (versions of Java) require different driver versions. Are there ODBC driver managers that require particular versions?
-----Original Message----- From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:peter_e@gmx.net] Sent: Sun 7/11/2004 8:48 PM To: Dave Page; pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [ODBC] ODBC version and Unicode > Are there any implications of having only a 0x0300 driver available? > For example, the JDBC people build various versions of the driver > because dfiferent run-time environments (versions of Java) require > different driver versions. Are there ODBC driver managers that require > particular versions? None that I am aware of. Anyone else know of any? Regards, Dave
Is odbc driver development discountinued ?? The last odbc driver is 9 months later .... Where's Mr Inoue ?? He don't meet the project ?? Thanks !
Am Mittwoch, 14. Juli 2004 14:01 schrieb Simeó Reig: > Is odbc driver development discountinued ?? The last odbc driver is 9 > months later .... > Where's Mr Inoue ?? He don't meet the project ?? There has been (and continues to be) a temporary shortage of developers, but we're hoping to pick up development and make a new release soon. -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/