Обсуждение: ODBC changes
Hi all,
I've committed changes to cvs for 7.2.0005.
This version is mainly for bug fixes.
Thanks to all bug reportes.
regards,
Hiroshi Inoue
http://w2422.nsk.ne.jp/~inoue/
2002 Nov 12
Fix a crash bug thanks to Ryo Hattori.
2002 Nov 13
1) Fixed pretty many 'if (..);' lines(my fault sorry).
2) Add a few #include lines(config.h pthread,h) for *nix.
3) Supress automatic client_encoding setting in some cases.
2002 Nov 22
Use SQL_TYPE_DATE, SQL_TYPE_TIME and SQL_TYPE_TIMESTAMP
instead of SQL_DATE, SQL_TIME and SQL_TIMESTAMP in ODBC
3.X.
Change SQLGetTypeinfo to display ODBC3.x info.
2002 Nov 25
Change SQLRowCount to return SQL_SUCCESS not SQL_ERROR
if the statement executed fine.
Fix a bug reported by Glen Parker.
2002 Nov 26
Change CURSOR_TYPE or CONCURRENCY statement attribute to
be reset on cursor close per bug report from Glen Parker.
Hi Hiroshi, Couple of questions: 1) Now seems the ideal time for 07.03.0001. Do you agree? 2) Is the ODBC3 driver ready to become the main one yet? I've not seen many bug reports - or for the Unicode one for that matter. Should we now junk the 2.5 version and just distribute the other 2? Regards, Dave. > -----Original Message----- > From: Hiroshi Inoue [mailto:Inoue@tpf.co.jp] > Sent: 27 November 2002 09:44 > To: pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org > Cc: Glen Parker; Dave Page > Subject: ODBC changes > > > Hi all, > > I've committed changes to cvs for 7.2.0005. > This version is mainly for bug fixes. > Thanks to all bug reportes. > > regards, > Hiroshi Inoue > http://w2422.nsk.ne.jp/~inoue/ > > 2002 Nov 12 > Fix a crash bug thanks to Ryo Hattori. > > 2002 Nov 13 > 1) Fixed pretty many 'if (..);' lines(my fault sorry). > 2) Add a few #include lines(config.h pthread,h) for *nix. > 3) Supress automatic client_encoding setting in some cases. > > 2002 Nov 22 > Use SQL_TYPE_DATE, SQL_TYPE_TIME and SQL_TYPE_TIMESTAMP > instead of SQL_DATE, SQL_TIME and SQL_TIMESTAMP in ODBC 3.X. > Change SQLGetTypeinfo to display ODBC3.x info. > > 2002 Nov 25 > Change SQLRowCount to return SQL_SUCCESS not SQL_ERROR > if the statement executed fine. > Fix a bug reported by Glen Parker. > > 2002 Nov 26 > Change CURSOR_TYPE or CONCURRENCY statement attribute to > be reset on cursor close per bug report from Glen Parker. >
Dave Page wrote:
>
> Hi Hiroshi,
>
> Couple of questions:
>
> 1) Now seems the ideal time for 07.03.0001. Do you agree?
I don't object to it.
> 2) Is the ODBC3 driver ready to become the main one yet?
> I've not seen many bug reports
I'm not sure how many people are using the ODBC3 driver.
> - or for the Unicode one for that matter.
I know an application which doesn't work with the Unicode
driver.
regards,
Hiroshi Inoue
http://w2422.nsk.ne.jp/~inoue/
> -----Original Message----- > From: Hiroshi Inoue [mailto:Inoue@tpf.co.jp] > Sent: 28 November 2002 01:42 > To: Dave Page > Cc: pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: ODBC changes > > > Dave Page wrote: > > > > Hi Hiroshi, > > > > Couple of questions: > > > > 1) Now seems the ideal time for 07.03.0001. Do you agree? > > I don't object to it. > > > 2) Is the ODBC3 driver ready to become the main one yet? > > I've not seen many bug reports > > I'm not sure how many people are using the ODBC3 driver. No, neither do I - it seems unlikely that we'll ever find out though unless we take the plunge. We know that 07.02.0004 is pretty good, so what about dropping the 2,5 version now, and if people have major problems then they can revert to that version until the ODBC3 one is fixed. Otherwise, we'll never know if it's ready. How does that sound? > > > - or for the Unicode one for that matter. > > I know an application which doesn't work with the Unicode driver. OK, we can leave that one labelled as Beta. Regards, Dave.
Dave Page wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Hiroshi Inoue [mailto:Inoue@tpf.co.jp]
>> Sent: 28 November 2002 01:42
>> To: Dave Page
>> Cc: pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org
>> Subject: Re: ODBC changes
>>
>>
>> Dave Page wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Hiroshi,
>>>
>>> Couple of questions:
>>>
>>> 1) Now seems the ideal time for 07.03.0001. Do you agree?
>>
>> I don't object to it.
>>
>>> 2) Is the ODBC3 driver ready to become the main one yet?
>>> I've not seen many bug reports
>>
>> I'm not sure how many people are using the ODBC3 driver.
>
> No, neither do I - it seems unlikely that we'll ever find out though
> unless we take the plunge.
>
> We know that 07.02.0004 is pretty good, so what about dropping the 2,5
> version now, and if people have major problems then they can revert to
> that version until the ODBC3 one is fixed. Otherwise, we'll never
> know if it's ready.
>
> How does that sound?
>
>>
>>> - or for the Unicode one for that matter.
>>
>> I know an application which doesn't work with the Unicode driver.
>
> OK, we can leave that one labelled as Beta.
>
> Regards, Dave.
>
How about leaving out the old one in and call it somethin like Postgresql25 Legacy?
Cheers,
- Stuart
-----Original Message-----
From: Henshall, Stuart - Design & Print [mailto:SHenshall@westcountry-design-print.co.uk]
Sent: 28 November 2002 10:42
To: Dave Page; Hiroshi Inoue
Cc: pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org
Subject: RE: [ODBC] ODBC changes
How about leaving out the old one in and call it somethin like Postgresql25 Legacy?
Cheers,
- Stuart
Not a bad idea. What do you think Hiroshi?
Regards, Dave.
From: Dave Page [mailto:dpage@vale-housing.co.uk]
-----Original Message-----
From: Henshall, Stuart - Design & Print [mailto:SHenshall@westcountry-design-print.co.uk]
Sent: 28 November 2002 10:42
To: Dave Page; Hiroshi Inoue
Cc: pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org
Subject: RE: [ODBC] ODBC changes
How about leaving out the old one in and call it somethin like Postgresql25 Legacy?
Cheers,
- StuartNot a bad idea. What do you think Hiroshi?
The reason why I'd like to release 7.2.0005 is that it contains a
crash bug fix and is more stable than 7.2.0004. The next release
may be less stable than this one unfortunately. In fact I already
chagned my local source but can't commit it to cvs.
If we would release the current beta driver as our standard one,
I'd like to do it from the next release.
regards,
Hiroshi Inoue
-----Original Message-----
From: Hiroshi Inoue [mailto:Inoue@tpf.co.jp]
Sent: 29 November 2002 00:05
To: Dave Page; Henshall, Stuart - Design & Print
Cc: pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org
Subject: RE: [ODBC] ODBC changes-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Page [mailto:dpage@vale-housing.co.uk]-----Original Message-----
From: Henshall, Stuart - Design & Print [mailto:SHenshall@westcountry-design-print.co.uk]
Sent: 28 November 2002 10:42
To: Dave Page; Hiroshi Inoue
Cc: pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org
Subject: RE: [ODBC] ODBC changes
How about leaving out the old one in and call it somethin like Postgresql25 Legacy?
Cheers,
- StuartNot a bad idea. What do you think Hiroshi?
The reason why I'd like to release 7.2.0005 is that it contains a
crash bug fix and is more stable than 7.2.0004. The next release
may be less stable than this one unfortunately. In fact I already
chagned my local source but can't commit it to cvs.
If we would release the current beta driver as our standard one,
I'd like to do it from the next release.
regards,
Hiroshi Inoue
OK then, that sounds like a plan:
1) I'll package 07.02.0005 (hopefully today).
2) The next release will be 07.03.0001
3) The next release will contain the following drivers:
PostgreSQL [psqlodbc30.dll]
PostgreSQL Legacy [psqlodbc.dll]
PostgreSQL Unicode (Beta) [psqlodbc30w.dll]
Sound good everyone?
Regards, Dave.