Обсуждение: Time for a new release?
It's been a while since 9.3-1100, would it be time for a new minor release? In particular, some VMware people are eager to get the setQueryTimeout fixes (commit fa078d6390d8b1c95b63cb65a801272c6bce9244) Is there anything I can do to help with making the release? - Heikki
I was thinking this myself. I did realize most of the PR's have been against master, so we have to go back through some of them and backpatch to 9_3
Dave Cramer
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 2:38 AM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com> wrote:
It's been a while since 9.3-1100, would it be time for a new minor release? In particular, some VMware people are eager to get the setQueryTimeout fixes (commit fa078d6390d8b1c95b63cb65a801272c6bce9244)
Is there anything I can do to help with making the release?
- Heikki
--
Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc
Hi, On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 09:38 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > It's been a while since 9.3-1100, would it be time for a new minor > release? In particular, some VMware people are eager to get the > setQueryTimeout fixes (commit > fa078d6390d8b1c95b63cb65a801272c6bce9244) > > Is there anything I can do to help with making the release? Please note that we are releasing new PG versions next week. It would be very good if you do the JDBC release just before that, to help the packagers' lives easier. Regards, -- Devrim GÜNDÜZ Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR
Вложения
Heikki
I just created a PR https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/pull/118 which will merge master into 93_STABLE can you look through it to make sure it's sane
Dave Cramer
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 6:20 AM, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim@gunduz.org> wrote:
Hi,Please note that we are releasing new PG versions next week. It would be
On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 09:38 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> It's been a while since 9.3-1100, would it be time for a new minor
> release? In particular, some VMware people are eager to get the
> setQueryTimeout fixes (commit
> fa078d6390d8b1c95b63cb65a801272c6bce9244)
>
> Is there anything I can do to help with making the release?
very good if you do the JDBC release just before that, to help the
packagers' lives easier.
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR
Looks good to me, except that you don't want to merge the change to bump the version number to 9.4-X to the REL9_3_STABLE branch. On 02/13/2014 01:44 PM, Dave Cramer wrote: > Heikki > > I just created a PR https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/pull/118 which will > merge master into 93_STABLE can you look through it to make sure it's sane > > Dave Cramer > > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 6:20 AM, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim@gunduz.org> wrote: > >> >> Hi, >> >> On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 09:38 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: >>> It's been a while since 9.3-1100, would it be time for a new minor >>> release? In particular, some VMware people are eager to get the >>> setQueryTimeout fixes (commit >>> fa078d6390d8b1c95b63cb65a801272c6bce9244) >>> >>> Is there anything I can do to help with making the release? >> >> Please note that we are releasing new PG versions next week. It would be >> very good if you do the JDBC release just before that, to help the >> packagers' lives easier. >> >> Regards, >> -- >> Devrim GÜNDÜZ >> Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com >> PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer >> Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR >> >> >> > -- - Heikki
So what git hub is doing is just checking out REL_9_3_STABLE then merging master . Is there a way to specify where it starts from ?
Dave Cramer
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 6:50 AM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com> wrote:
Looks good to me, except that you don't want to merge the change to bump the version number to 9.4-X to the REL9_3_STABLE branch.--
On 02/13/2014 01:44 PM, Dave Cramer wrote:Heikki
I just created a PR https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/pull/118 which will
merge master into 93_STABLE can you look through it to make sure it's sane
Dave Cramer
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 6:20 AM, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim@gunduz.org> wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 09:38 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:It's been a while since 9.3-1100, would it be time for a new minor
release? In particular, some VMware people are eager to get the
setQueryTimeout fixes (commit
fa078d6390d8b1c95b63cb65a801272c6bce9244)
Is there anything I can do to help with making the release?
Please note that we are releasing new PG versions next week. It would be
very good if you do the JDBC release just before that, to help the
packagers' lives easier.
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR
- Heikki
nm I figured it out, I can just revert one commit after the merge
Dave Cramer
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 7:01 AM, Dave Cramer <davecramer@gmail.com> wrote:
So what git hub is doing is just checking out REL_9_3_STABLE then merging master . Is there a way to specify where it starts from ?Dave CramerOn Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 6:50 AM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com> wrote:Looks good to me, except that you don't want to merge the change to bump the version number to 9.4-X to the REL9_3_STABLE branch.--
On 02/13/2014 01:44 PM, Dave Cramer wrote:Heikki
I just created a PR https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/pull/118 which will
merge master into 93_STABLE can you look through it to make sure it's sane
Dave Cramer
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 6:20 AM, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim@gunduz.org> wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 09:38 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:It's been a while since 9.3-1100, would it be time for a new minor
release? In particular, some VMware people are eager to get the
setQueryTimeout fixes (commit
fa078d6390d8b1c95b63cb65a801272c6bce9244)
Is there anything I can do to help with making the release?
Please note that we are releasing new PG versions next week. It would be
very good if you do the JDBC release just before that, to help the
packagers' lives easier.
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR
- Heikki
On 02/13/2014 01:01 PM, Dave Cramer wrote: > So what git hub is doing is just checking out REL_9_3_STABLE then > merging master . Is there a way to specify where it starts from ? You can merge the commit for the version bump without merging the actual changes, then Git will pick that as the common ancestor. -- Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security Team
snapshots can be found here
Dave Cramer
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 6:50 AM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com> wrote:
Looks good to me, except that you don't want to merge the change to bump the version number to 9.4-X to the REL9_3_STABLE branch.--
On 02/13/2014 01:44 PM, Dave Cramer wrote:Heikki
I just created a PR https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/pull/118 which will
merge master into 93_STABLE can you look through it to make sure it's sane
Dave Cramer
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 6:20 AM, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim@gunduz.org> wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 09:38 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:It's been a while since 9.3-1100, would it be time for a new minor
release? In particular, some VMware people are eager to get the
setQueryTimeout fixes (commit
fa078d6390d8b1c95b63cb65a801272c6bce9244)
Is there anything I can do to help with making the release?
Please note that we are releasing new PG versions next week. It would be
very good if you do the JDBC release just before that, to help the
packagers' lives easier.
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR
- Heikki
Thanks. Can you push the changes to the git repository too, please? On 02/14/2014 01:12 PM, Dave Cramer wrote: > snapshots can be found here > > https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/postgresql/postgresql/ > > Dave Cramer > > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 6:50 AM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com >> wrote: > >> Looks good to me, except that you don't want to merge the change to bump >> the version number to 9.4-X to the REL9_3_STABLE branch. >> >> >> On 02/13/2014 01:44 PM, Dave Cramer wrote: >> >>> Heikki >>> >>> I just created a PR https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/pull/118 which will >>> merge master into 93_STABLE can you look through it to make sure it's sane >>> >>> Dave Cramer >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 6:20 AM, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim@gunduz.org> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 09:38 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: >>>> >>>>> It's been a while since 9.3-1100, would it be time for a new minor >>>>> release? In particular, some VMware people are eager to get the >>>>> setQueryTimeout fixes (commit >>>>> fa078d6390d8b1c95b63cb65a801272c6bce9244) >>>>> >>>>> Is there anything I can do to help with making the release? >>>>> >>>> >>>> Please note that we are releasing new PG versions next week. It would be >>>> very good if you do the JDBC release just before that, to help the >>>> packagers' lives easier. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> -- >>>> Devrim GÜNDÜZ >>>> Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com >>>> PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer >>>> Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> -- >> - Heikki >> > -- - Heikki
Done
Dave Cramer
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 8:08 AM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com> wrote:
Thanks. Can you push the changes to the git repository too, please?--
On 02/14/2014 01:12 PM, Dave Cramer wrote:snapshots can be found here
https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/postgresql/postgresql/
Dave Cramer
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 6:50 AM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.comwrote:Looks good to me, except that you don't want to merge the change to bump
the version number to 9.4-X to the REL9_3_STABLE branch.
On 02/13/2014 01:44 PM, Dave Cramer wrote:Heikki
I just created a PR https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/pull/118 which will
merge master into 93_STABLE can you look through it to make sure it's sane
Dave Cramer
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 6:20 AM, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim@gunduz.org> wrote:Hi,
On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 09:38 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:It's been a while since 9.3-1100, would it be time for a new minor
release? In particular, some VMware people are eager to get the
setQueryTimeout fixes (commit
fa078d6390d8b1c95b63cb65a801272c6bce9244)
Is there anything I can do to help with making the release?
Please note that we are releasing new PG versions next week. It would be
very good if you do the JDBC release just before that, to help the
packagers' lives easier.
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR
--
- Heikki
- Heikki
Here's a patch to the pgjdbc-www project to add to the changelog. I generated it with: git log REL9_3_1100..origin/REL9_3_STABLE It includes all commits, including merge commits and things that don't really apply to 9.3 stable (opened HEAD for 9.4 development). I don't think that actually makes much sense, but that seems to be the way the changelog for other versions have also been generated, and now is not the time to come up with new processes, as we're trying to get the release out. In the future, I think we should write separate release notes, and not bother publishing the commit log on the website. The commit log is pretty much unreadable to anyone who's not intimately familiar with both pgjdbc and the way git merges work. A link to github will do if someone wants to look at the commit history. But a separately written release notes, much like the PostgreSQL server project does, would be very useful. Yes, it requires some effort to write them, but there aren't that many fixes and features in a pgjdbc release, so it's not too bad. Oops, I think I just volunteered :-). - Heikki
Вложения
Heikki
Thanks for the patch and volunteering... One way to deal with this is to annotate the logs with #RELEASE# and then use git log and grep to find the release notes. I've been lazy but it is a very low tech way to achieve the result
Dave Cramer
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 8:37 AM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com> wrote:
Here's a patch to the pgjdbc-www project to add to the changelog. I generated it with:
git log REL9_3_1100..origin/REL9_3_STABLE
It includes all commits, including merge commits and things that don't really apply to 9.3 stable (opened HEAD for 9.4 development). I don't think that actually makes much sense, but that seems to be the way the changelog for other versions have also been generated, and now is not the time to come up with new processes, as we're trying to get the release out.
In the future, I think we should write separate release notes, and not bother publishing the commit log on the website. The commit log is pretty much unreadable to anyone who's not intimately familiar with both pgjdbc and the way git merges work. A link to github will do if someone wants to look at the commit history. But a separately written release notes, much like the PostgreSQL server project does, would be very useful. Yes, it requires some effort to write them, but there aren't that many fixes and features in a pgjdbc release, so it's not too bad. Oops, I think I just volunteered :-).
- Heikki