Обсуждение: SQLJ, any plans?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка

SQLJ, any plans?

От
Jaime Casanova
Дата:
Hello all,

are there any plans to get embedded SQL (SQLJ) to work with the jdbc
in postgres?

--
regards,
Jaime Casanova
(DBA: DataBase Aniquilator ;)

Re: SQLJ, any plans?

От
Oliver Jowett
Дата:
Jaime Casanova wrote:

> are there any plans to get embedded SQL (SQLJ) to work with the jdbc
> in postgres?

What fails with the current driver?

-O

Re: SQLJ, any plans?

От
Jaime Casanova
Дата:
On 11/25/05, Oliver Jowett <oliver@opencloud.com> wrote:
> Jaime Casanova wrote:
>
> > are there any plans to get embedded SQL (SQLJ) to work with the jdbc
> > in postgres?
>
> What fails with the current driver?
>
> -O
>

The driver works fine, AFAIK... but it can use  the SQLJ syntax?

#sql { SELECT campo INTO :var FROM tabla WHERE id = :id_var; }

--
regards,
Jaime Casanova
(DBA: DataBase Aniquilator ;)

Re: SQLJ, any plans?

От
Oliver Jowett
Дата:
Jaime Casanova wrote:
> On 11/25/05, Oliver Jowett <oliver@opencloud.com> wrote:
>
>>Jaime Casanova wrote:
>>
>>>are there any plans to get embedded SQL (SQLJ) to work with the jdbc
>>>in postgres?
>>
>>What fails with the current driver?
>>
>
> The driver works fine, AFAIK... but it can use  the SQLJ syntax?

Uh.. from my limited knowledge of SQLJ, isn't it like "embedded SQL" in
the C world? i.e. you have a translator (the equivalent to ecpg) that
takes annotated source with SQLJ syntax and turns it into a regular Java
source file that uses standard JDBC? So the driver itself never sees the
SQLJ syntax..

Sounds like what you are looking for is a SQLJ translator? I don't know
of any plans to write a postgresql-specific translator .. aren't there
generic ones available, since the DB-level interface (JDBC) is standardized?

-O