Обсуждение: Re: [HACKERS] bugzilla.pgaccess.org
> > Just out of curiosity, what database is backing it? > > > > If it isn't PostgreSQL, what about using PHP BugTracker instead? That > > runs on top of PostgreSQL. > > > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/phpbt/ > > > > > > Jan > > > Or Gborg... ;-) > > http://gborg.postgresql.org/project/gborg/projdisplay.php > > Cheers, > Ned Any other suggestions? Iavor
Josh Berkus said: > Iavor, > >> Any other suggestions? > > I can tell you from experience that Double-Choco-Latte, another > PHP/PostgreSQL tool, is really set up just for single projects. So it > would work fine for PGAccess-only. However, DCL has its own problems > and is not necessarily better than Mozilla; I personally don't think > it's worth switching tools just to eat our own dogfood if we don't gain > some functionality in the process. > > I'd love to re-write one of these tools someday; they all have ghastly > UI problems. Right. Just after I do the accounting program, and get > caught up on my tax filing, and re-paint the bathroom ... Thanks, Josh. This was the answer I wanted to hear. > The one thing that really "bugs" me about Mozilla/Issuezilla is that, > if you click the link on an issue e-mail, you don't get automatically > logged in, forcing you to search for the bug a second time if you want > to commment or close the issue. Grrr. Also there's no option *not* to > get the darned e-mails for people who check the web interface > regularly. What don't you try bugzilla.bugzilla.org or something like that :) I mean - the guys at Mozilla have made a great product using Bugzilla. I would be happy if we bring pgaccess at least to the level of Mozilla. Then we can talk about changing the bug tracking system. Agreed?
On Wed, 2002-07-10 at 21:49, Iavor Raytchev wrote: > Josh Berkus said: > > Iavor, > > > >> Any other suggestions? > > > > I can tell you from experience that Double-Choco-Latte, another > > PHP/PostgreSQL tool, is really set up just for single projects. So it > > would work fine for PGAccess-only. However, DCL has its own problems > > and is not necessarily better than Mozilla; I personally don't think > > it's worth switching tools just to eat our own dogfood if we don't gain > > some functionality in the process. Still we could use the bugzilla variant that uses PostgreSQL for its DB. You can download it from the link uder the perl seal on the page https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/index.cgi It points to ftp://people.redhat.com/dkl where are variants for mysql, oracle and postgresql. The only thing you have to do after install is changing the first lines of scripts as they currently ppoint to #!/usr/bonsaitools/bin/perl which you may not have ;) --------------- Hannu
Iavor, > Any other suggestions? I can tell you from experience that Double-Choco-Latte, another PHP/PostgreSQL tool, is really set up just for single projects. So it would work fine for PGAccess-only. However, DCL has its own problems and is not necessarily better than Mozilla; I personally don't think it's worth switching tools just to eat our own dogfood if we don't gain some functionality in the process. I'd love to re-write one of these tools someday; they all have ghastly UI problems. Right. Just after I do the accounting program, and get caught up on my tax filing, and re-paint the bathroom ... The one thing that really "bugs" me about Mozilla/Issuezilla is that, if you click the link on an issue e-mail, you don't get automatically logged in, forcing you to search for the bug a second time if you want to commment or close the issue. Grrr. Also there's no option *not* to get the darned e-mails for people who check the web interface regularly. -Josh
> Still we could use the bugzilla variant that uses PostgreSQL for its DB. > > You can download it from the link uder the perl seal on the page > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/index.cgi > > It points to ftp://people.redhat.com/dkl where are variants for mysql, > oracle and postgresql. > > The only thing you have to do after install is changing the first lines > of scripts as they currently ppoint to #!/usr/bonsaitools/bin/perl which > you may not have ;) Don't you think it is better to wait for Bugzilla 2.18 that will support PostgreSQL fresh from the bugzilla.org - I would like to focus on pgaccess now :)
Hello everybody, I want to apologise for inflating all lists (as Chris noticed) with insignificant discussions. I would like to invite all pgaccess involved people to restrict their postings to developers@pgaccess.org, unless there is a good reason for doing it differently. Thanks, Iavor PS I get the impression that some of the lists repeat the messages more than once and sometimes with a delay... or there is something wrong with my filters...
Iavor Raytchev wrote: > > Hello everybody, > > I want to apologise for inflating all lists (as Chris noticed) with > insignificant discussions. I would like to invite all pgaccess involved > people to restrict their postings to developers@pgaccess.org, unless there > is a good reason for doing it differently. I am not subscribed to that list. So you would've missed my 2 cents. Jan -- #======================================================================# # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. # # Let's break this rule - forgive me. # #================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #
On Wed, 2002-07-10 at 18:35, Iavor Raytchev wrote: > > Still we could use the bugzilla variant that uses PostgreSQL for its DB. ... > > Don't you think it is better to wait for Bugzilla 2.18 that will support > PostgreSQL fresh from the bugzilla.org - I would like to focus on pgaccess > now :) How hard will the migration from MySQLzilla to PostgreSQLzilla be ? ----------- Hannu