Обсуждение: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Replace ALTER TABLE ...
On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 16:40 +0000, Robert Haas wrote: > Log Message: > ----------- > Replace ALTER TABLE ... SET STATISTICS DISTINCT with a more general > mechanism. I think this broke doc builds: openjade -wall -wno-unused-param -wno-empty -wfully-tagged -D . -D . -c /usr/share/sgml/docbook/dsssl-stylesheets/catalog-d stylesheet.dsl -t sgml -i output-html -V html-index postgres.sgml openjade:ref/alter_table.sgml:162:156:E: end tag for "LITERAL" omitted, but OMITTAG NO was specified openjade:ref/alter_table.sgml:162:10: start tag was here openjade:ref/alter_table.sgml:162:166:E: end tag for element "LITERAL" which is not open openjade:ref/alter_table.sgml:164:13:E: document type does not allow element "LISTITEM" here openjade:ref/alter_table.sgml:191:17:E: end tag for "TERM" omitted, but OMITTAG NO was specified openjade:ref/alter_table.sgml:163:4: start tag was here openjade:ref/alter_table.sgml:191:17:E: end tag for "VARLISTENTRY" which is not finished gmake: *** [HTML.index] Error 1 gmake: *** Deleting file `HTML.index' -- Devrim GÜNDÜZ, RHCE Command Prompt - http://www.CommandPrompt.com devrim~gunduz.org, devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr http://www.gunduz.org Twitter: http://twitter.com/devrimgunduz
2010/1/22 Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim@gunduz.org>: > On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 16:40 +0000, Robert Haas wrote: >> Log Message: >> ----------- >> Replace ALTER TABLE ... SET STATISTICS DISTINCT with a more general >> mechanism. > > I think this broke doc builds: Dang, how'd that happen? I could have sworn I tested this. Will fix, sorry. ...Robert
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> 2010/1/22 Devrim G�ND�Z <devrim@gunduz.org>:
>> I think this broke doc builds:
> Dang, how'd that happen? I could have sworn I tested this.
Some versions of docbook are pickier than others --- maybe yours
didn't complain?
regards, tom lane
2010/1/22 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>: > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: >> 2010/1/22 Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim@gunduz.org>: >>> I think this broke doc builds: > >> Dang, how'd that happen? I could have sworn I tested this. > > Some versions of docbook are pickier than others --- maybe yours > didn't complain? It's complaining now, so I don't think that's it. I think maybe I just got confused because I rebuilt the docs for my libpq patch about 10 times yesterday, and I ASSUMED that because I hadn't changed the docs for this patch in a long time I didn't need to retest. But maybe I never did test them after all. I spent the whole morning making sure it didn't break with -DCLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS=1. One of these days I'll manage to do one of these that doesn't require 2 or 3 follow-on commits... ...Robert