Обсуждение: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] %2$, %1$ gettext placeholder replacement is not working under Win32
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] %2$, %1$ gettext placeholder replacement is not working under Win32
От
"Magnus Hagander"
Дата:
>> I don't think we'll hold up release to fix this, but the affected >> translators may want to think about whether they can avoid >the problem >> or not. > >Also, it looks like src/port/snprintf.c is not %n$ capable either. >I'm not sure which platforms that affects. > >A possible route to a solution is to upgrade snprintf.c and then use >it on platforms that don't have this support. This only fixes those >cases where we go through snprintf, which is probably not all of the >affected messages, but it might be enough. It's not happening for >8.0.0 though. Might want to track down which platforms are affected by the file in port/, and then add win32 to it, and put it up somewhere on a list of known issues in 8.0? //Magnus
Greetings, for a couple of days I have been hacking on src/port/snprintf.c. With Magnus' help I have managed to implement argument replacement in snprintf(). The code is very crude and not quite optimised, any suggestions will be more than welcome. Here is what I did: 1. I renamed snprintf() to pg_snprintf(), vsnprintf() to pg_vsnprintf() and introduced pg_printf() that calls pg_vsnprintf(). 2. After running configure I manually added snprintf.o to src/Makefile.global's LIBOBJ declaration and -lpgport to Makefile.shlib's DLLWRAP declaration 3. To make sure these functions are used everywhere I introduced the following lines at the end of src/include/c.h: #define snprintf pg_snprintf #define vsnprintf pg_vsnprintf #define printf pg_printf 4. I introduced a volatile static char[] variable in snprintf.c code so I can grep executables for this string and be sure that it is included. 5. Before running regression test I always ran make install, apparently because libpq is read from /usr/local/. During compilation the following warnings were reported: ../../../src/include/utils/elog.h:121: warning: `pg_printf' is an unrecognized format function type which is perfectly fine because we replace printf with pg_printf and gcc's format() does know anything about it. On Linux, PostgreSQL passed regression tests with flying colours and prints messages with %n$ just fine. On win32: int8, timestamp, timestamptz, abstime, horology, constraints, vacuum, and many others failed. To check my code, I reverted snprintf.c to the original one from CVS and forced win32 port to use these functions and it fails in same places. After examining regression tests diff I came to conclusion that problem is in fmtnum() function when it operates with particularly long integers. In snprintf() file I changed only and only dopr() function, neve touching fmtnum(), fmtstr() or fmtfolat(). I would like to kindly ask these questions: 1. Am I on the right to implement %n$ ? Can it be accepted? 2. Why would we not just take FreeBSD's vfprintf() and use it instead? 3. What is wrong with fmtnum() on Win32? 4. What %m format string is used for? And where is it handled. Do I need to implement it? I am attaching my version if snprintf.c (because it is too different from the original to make a patch) and regression.diff of a failed Win32 regression test produced wither with my or with original snprintf.c. Best regards, Nicolai Tufar
Nicolai Tufar wrote: > 1. I renamed snprintf() to pg_snprintf(), vsnprintf() to > pg_vsnprintf() and introduced pg_printf() that calls pg_vsnprintf(). This is not necessary. You will notice that we already have configure tests of snprintf format specifiers (%lld etc.), so using the original function names is OK even in that case. > 4. I introduced a volatile static char[] variable in snprintf.c code > so I can grep executables for this string and be sure that it is > included. Remove that when finalizing the code. > 5. Before running regression test I always ran make install, > apparently because libpq is read from /usr/local/. That's because of the -rpath. > 2. Why would we not just take FreeBSD's vfprintf() and use it > instead? Try it. It's painful. > 4. What %m format string is used for? And where is it handled. Do I > need to implement it? It's only used in the error reporting functions in the server and is handled there. You don't need to worry about it. -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 15:31:39 +0100, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote: > Nicolai Tufar wrote: > > 1. I renamed snprintf() to pg_snprintf(), vsnprintf() to > > pg_vsnprintf() and introduced pg_printf() that calls pg_vsnprintf(). > > This is not necessary. You will notice that we already have configure > tests of snprintf format specifiers (%lld etc.), so using the original > function names is OK even in that case. how about a test for the thing like: printf("%2$s %1$s!\n", "world", "Hello"); It is what I am trying to solve :( > > 5. Before running regression test I always ran make install, > > apparently because libpq is read from /usr/local/. > > That's because of the -rpath. I see. Thanks for information. > > > 2. Why would we not just take FreeBSD's vfprintf() and use it > > instead? > > Try it. It's painful. src/port/snprintf.c is not not a particularly pretty. And after my rework it got even uglier. I have looked at FreeBDS's one and it is not *that* complicated. Would you like me to try to incorporate into PostgreSQL. NetBSD's one is somewhat simplier but does not support %n$ feature by the way. > > 4. What %m format string is used for? And where is it handled. Do I > > need to implement it? > > It's only used in the error reporting functions in the server and is > handled there. You don't need to worry about it. Oh, that is a relief. > Peter Eisentraut Nicolai
Nicolai Tufar <ntufar@gmail.com> writes: > On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 15:31:39 +0100, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote: >> Nicolai Tufar wrote: >>> 2. Why would we not just take FreeBSD's vfprintf() and use it >>> instead? >> >> Try it. It's painful. > src/port/snprintf.c is not not a particularly pretty. And > after my rework it got even uglier. I have looked at > FreeBDS's one and it is not *that* complicated. If you can get it to work then it'd be a better bet than writing (and having to maintain) our own. regards, tom lane
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 17:05:22 -0500, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > > src/port/snprintf.c is not not a particularly pretty. And > > after my rework it got even uglier. I have looked at > > FreeBDS's one and it is not *that* complicated. > > If you can get it to work then it'd be a better bet than writing (and > having to maintain) our own. Very well, I am starting to work on it. I will put everything necessary in on file. So far it is 1500-odd lines and will probably grow a little bit. Plus we would probably need to include Double-to-ASCII package too: http://cvsup.pt.freebsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/cvsweb.cgi/src/contrib/gdtoa/ A daunting task indeed. I will do it but I am afraid it would not be too portable. I was wandering if reimplementing print formatting is the right thing to do. The problem I have is in fmtnum() and probably in fmtfloat() functions which are very platform-dependent. The code to shuffle xxprinf() arguments based on %n$ formatting stirngs is ready why don't shuffle formatting placeholders too and call OS's vsnprintf() with modified formatting formatting strings and va_list? Or, a similar solution, for every parameter extract formatting placeholder and value, call snprintf() and the combine the resulting string? The first solution requires doing nasty manipulations with va_list, the second will be slower because of multiple calls to snprintf(). Which one is better? Best regards, Nicolai Tufar > > regards, tom lane >
Greetings, I would like to submit a new version of src/port/snprintf.c It passes regression tests on Linux and Win32 and prints all of %n$ messages finely. I added printf() function too because --help usage-type output is printed with printf(). I have no experience with autoconf so I would ask you for help on what changes to do to include libpgport to src/Makefile.global and src/Makefile.shlib. PostgreSQL uses snprintf() in more places than I expected. So these changes need a through testing. I have no 64-bit to able to run regression test on it would be nice to run it on a 64-bit platform too. Best regards, Nicolai Tufar