Обсуждение: Re: [GENERAL] java stored procedures

Hi!

Sorry, I have time only for short ansvers, it is company time :((.

Gunnar Rønning wrote:

>* Barry Lind <barry@xythos.com> wrote:
>|
>| possible problems with your strategy).  Without knowing what exactly
>| you are thinking of doing it is difficult to comment.
>
>Agreed.
>
Ok, I will try to bring the code here before Monday, or at least some
pieces. It is full of hardcoded constants from my developement
environment. :(


>
>| I am very interested in hearing what your plans are for pl/java.  I
>| think this is a very difficult project, but one that would be very
>| useful and welcome.
>
>I would very much like to hear about the plans myself.
>
I do not see so big difficulities yet, am I so lame? It won`t be easy,
realy, we should keep it simple, at least becouse of me.


thanks,
Laszlo Hornyak

Laszlo Hornyak wrote:

>>
>> | I am very interested in hearing what your plans are for pl/java.  I
>> | think this is a very difficult project, but one that would be very
>> | useful and welcome.
>>
>> I would very much like to hear about the plans myself.
>
> I do not see so big difficulities yet, am I so lame? It won`t be easy,
> realy, we should keep it simple, at least becouse of me.

Let me propose a very different approach to PL/J - use gcc-java and
figure out the problems
with (dynamic) compiling and dynamic linking.

This is an approach somewhat similar to .NET/C# that you first compile
things and then run instead
of trying to do both at the same time ;)

Oracle /may/ be doing something similar with their java stored
procedures, as they claim these to be "compiled".

-----------------
Hannu