Обсуждение: loss of portability in ecpg

Current ecpg sources will not build on a compiler that doesn't accept
"long long int".  They are also overly optimistic about the prospects
of having strtoull() in libc.  I think some autoconf work is needed
here.
        regards, tom lane

Tom Lane writes:

> Current ecpg sources will not build on a compiler that doesn't accept
> "long long int".  They are also overly optimistic about the prospects
> of having strtoull() in libc.  I think some autoconf work is needed
> here.

Will look.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut      peter_e@gmx.net       http://yi.org/peter-e/

On Wed, Sep 20, 2000 at 11:20:05AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Current ecpg sources will not build on a compiler that doesn't accept
> "long long int".  They are also overly optimistic about the prospects
> of having strtoull() in libc.  I think some autoconf work is needed
> here.

Sorry about that. I intented to tell you about these changes since I do not
know autoconf enough to make the changes myself but real life
interfered after I committed them. And then I simply forgot about it. My
fault.

Please take my apologies.

Michael
-- 
Michael Meskes
Michael@Fam-Meskes.De
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire!
Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!