Re: loss of portability in ecpg

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Meskes
Тема Re: loss of portability in ecpg
Дата
Msg-id 20000921101202.A1400@feivel.credativ.de
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на loss of portability in ecpg  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Sep 20, 2000 at 11:20:05AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Current ecpg sources will not build on a compiler that doesn't accept
> "long long int".  They are also overly optimistic about the prospects
> of having strtoull() in libc.  I think some autoconf work is needed
> here.

Sorry about that. I intented to tell you about these changes since I do not
know autoconf enough to make the changes myself but real life
interfered after I committed them. And then I simply forgot about it. My
fault.

Please take my apologies.

Michael
-- 
Michael Meskes
Michael@Fam-Meskes.De
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire!
Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tatsuo Ishii
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: -S is missing in postgresql.conf?
Следующее
От: Michael Meskes
Дата:
Сообщение: PQsetdbLogin