Обсуждение: regression test HAVING fixed
I have fixed the problem I introduced with aggregates. They should work now, and the HAVING regression test should work too. -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > I have fixed the problem I introduced with aggregates. They should work > now, and the HAVING regression test should work too. Also, I put in Vadim's recommended fix for the subplan problem. The regression tests look a lot better than they did. The "union" test is still failing by adding a bunch of NOTICE: equal: don't know whether nodes of type 600 are equal lines to the expected output. Anybody know what's causing that? regards, tom lane
Tom Lane wrote: > > Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > I have fixed the problem I introduced with aggregates. They should work > > now, and the HAVING regression test should work too. > > Also, I put in Vadim's recommended fix for the subplan problem. > The regression tests look a lot better than they did. The "union" > test is still failing by adding a bunch of > > NOTICE: equal: don't know whether nodes of type 600 are equal > > lines to the expected output. Anybody know what's causing that? Type 600 is Query node. Attempt to compare Queries? Try gdb with break point @ equalfuncs.c:746... Vadim