Обсуждение: pgsql: Make path to pg_service.conf absolute in documentation

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка

pgsql: Make path to pg_service.conf absolute in documentation

От
Magnus Hagander
Дата:
Make path to pg_service.conf absolute in documentation

The system file is always in the absolute path /etc/, not relative.

David Fetter

Branch
------
REL9_0_STABLE

Details
-------
http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/07bec318b4f19ffe08cbcb7aaeed0e4949fd0cef

Modified Files
--------------
doc/src/sgml/libpq.sgml |    2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)


Re: pgsql: Make path to pg_service.conf absolute in documentation

От
Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
On 1/3/15 7:22 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Make path to pg_service.conf absolute in documentation
>
> The system file is always in the absolute path /etc/, not relative.

This change is incorrect.  pg_service.conf is never at
/etc/pg_service.conf.  It would be at /etc/postgresql/pg_service.conf,
if you configured with --sysconfdir=/etc.

I think the intent of the original wording was that it was in the etc
directory relative to the installation root.  I think that is more
correct than claiming that it is always in one particular location.

>
> David Fetter
>
> Branch
> ------
> REL9_0_STABLE
>
> Details
> -------
> http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/07bec318b4f19ffe08cbcb7aaeed0e4949fd0cef
>
> Modified Files
> --------------
> doc/src/sgml/libpq.sgml |    2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>



Re: pgsql: Make path to pg_service.conf absolute in documentation

От
Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
On 01/13/2015 04:16 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 1/3/15 7:22 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> Make path to pg_service.conf absolute in documentation
>>
>> The system file is always in the absolute path /etc/, not relative.
> This change is incorrect.  pg_service.conf is never at
> /etc/pg_service.conf.  It would be at /etc/postgresql/pg_service.conf,
> if you configured with --sysconfdir=/etc.
>
> I think the intent of the original wording was that it was in the etc
> directory relative to the installation root.  I think that is more
> correct than claiming that it is always in one particular location.
>

There was a long discussion about this on -hackers a week or so ago. I'm
not sure what the outcome was - it seemed rather messy.

cheers

andrew