Обсуждение: range value problem with double precision [PG 8.3.3]
Hi , =A0I see one issue pg 8.3.3 . 1. According to the documentation of pg "The double precision type typically has a range of around 1E-307 to 1E+308 with a precision of at least 15 digits". ref:- =A0http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/static/datatype-numeric.html but in PG8.3 the values less then minimum range are being inserted. e.g . on insertion of 1E-308 we should get an error of "out of range or underflow value" but this value is being accepted by server. Thanks, Zahid K. =20=20=20=20=20=20=
Zahid Khan wrote: > Hi , > > I see one issue pg 8.3.3 . > > 1. > According to the documentation of pg "The double precision type > typically has a range of around 1E-307 to 1E+308 with a precision of at > least 15 digits". > > ref:- > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/static/datatype-numeric.html > > but in PG8.3 the values less then minimum range are being inserted. > > e.g > . on insertion of 1E-308 we should get an error of "out of range or > underflow value" but this value is being accepted by server. The operating words are "typically" and "around". You can put in smaller and larger values, but then the precision is going to degrade, as you can observe here: peter=# select '1E-305'::float8; float8 -------- 1e-305 (1 row) peter=# select '1E-310'::float8; float8 ----------------------- 9.99999999999997e-311 (1 row) peter=# select '1E-315'::float8; float8 ----------------------- 9.99999998481684e-316 (1 row) peter=# select '1E-320'::float8; float8 ----------------------- 9.99988867182683e-321 (1 row) peter=# select '1E-325'::float8; ERROR: 22003: "1E-325" is out of range for type double precision LOCATION: float8in, float.c:426 The following, however, appears to be a bug: peter=# select '1E-324'::float8; ERROR: 22P02: invalid input syntax for type double precision: "1E-324" LOCATION: float8in, float.c:431
hmmm,What I see is, I was getting error=A0 of underflow valuein PG8.2=A0 wh= en i tried to insert '1E-307' in table with double precision.And my applica= tion was expecting the same error condition with the same values=A0 against= PG 8.3.3 as well.but now thats not the case? Thanks, Zahid K. --- On Fri, 8/22/08, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote: From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> Subject: Re: [BUGS] range value problem with double precision [PG 8.3.3] To: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org, khanzahid235@yahoo.com Date: Friday, August 22, 2008, 5:43 AM Zahid Khan wrote: > Hi , > > =A0I see one issue pg 8.3.3 . > > 1. > According to the documentation of pg "The double precision type > typically has a range of around 1E-307 to 1E+308 with a precision of at > least 15 digits". > > ref:- > =A0http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/static/datatype-numeric.html > > but in PG8.3 the values less then minimum range are being inserted. > > e.g > . on insertion of 1E-308 we should get an error of "out of range or > underflow value" but this value is being accepted by server. The operating words are "typically" and "around". You can put in smaller and=20 larger values, but then the precision is going to degrade, as you can obser= ve=20 here: peter=3D# select '1E-305'::float8; float8 -------- 1e-305 (1 row) peter=3D# select '1E-310'::float8; float8 ----------------------- 9.99999999999997e-311 (1 row) peter=3D# select '1E-315'::float8; float8 ----------------------- 9.99999998481684e-316 (1 row) peter=3D# select '1E-320'::float8; float8 ----------------------- 9.99988867182683e-321 (1 row) peter=3D# select '1E-325'::float8; ERROR: 22003: "1E-325" is out of range for type double precision LOCATION: float8in, float.c:426 The following, however, appears to be a bug: peter=3D# select '1E-324'::float8; ERROR: 22P02: invalid input syntax for type double precision: "1E-324" LOCATION: float8in, float.c:431 =20=20=20=20=20=20=
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > The following, however, appears to be a bug: > peter=# select '1E-324'::float8; > ERROR: 22P02: invalid input syntax for type double precision: "1E-324" > LOCATION: float8in, float.c:431 I see this behavior on Fedora 9, but not on HPUX. Investigation shows that F9's strtod returns EDOM not ERANGE for this case. Seems like a glibc bug ... regards, tom lane