Обсуждение: Bug #676: lower(), upper(), & initcap() do not work on utf-8 chars
Bug #676: lower(), upper(), & initcap() do not work on utf-8 chars
От
pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
Дата:
Henry House (hajhouse@houseag.com) reports a bug with a severity of 3
The lower the number the more severe it is.
Short Description
lower(), upper(), & initcap() do not work on utf-8 chars
Long Description
The string case manipulation functions lower(), upper(), & initcap()
have no effect on non-ASCII characters in the argument, such as æ, å,
ø, ä, etc. ASCII chars in the argument are properly up- or down-cased.
The database encoding is UTF-8.
Sample Code
SELECT upper('æ');
No file was uploaded with this report
pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org writes:
> The string case manipulation functions lower(), upper(), & initcap()
> have no effect on non-ASCII characters in the argument, such as æ, å,
> ø, ä, etc. ASCII chars in the argument are properly up- or down-cased.
> The database encoding is UTF-8.
lower/upper-casing is driven by locale, not encoding.
Unfortunately you didn't mention anything about your locale setup...
regards, tom lane
Henry House <hajhouse@houseag.com> writes:
>> Unfortunately you didn't mention anything about your locale setup...
> The server locale is en_US.UTF-8. (At least I set it up as such when
> installing PostgreSQL; I know no way to verify.) The server version is 7.2.=
> 1,
> running on a IA32 and a DEC Alpha; both machines show the same behavior. Bo=
> th
> are Debian Linux. Perhaps the bug lies in the locale definition supplied by
> Debian?
Offhand I'd not necessarily expect an en_US locale to upcase/downcase
anything except a-z/A-Z. Perhaps you need to use a different locale.
I'd suggest taking this up with a locale expert, which I surely am
not.
regards, tom lane
On Sat, May 25, 2002 at 12:56:06AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org writes: > > The string case manipulation functions lower(), upper(), & initcap()=20 > > have no effect on non-ASCII characters in the argument, such as =EF=BF= =BD, =EF=BF=BD,=20 > > =EF=BF=BD, =EF=BF=BD, etc. ASCII chars in the argument are properly up-= or down-cased. > > The database encoding is UTF-8.=09 >=20 > lower/upper-casing is driven by locale, not encoding. >=20 > Unfortunately you didn't mention anything about your locale setup... The server locale is en_US.UTF-8. (At least I set it up as such when installing PostgreSQL; I know no way to verify.) The server version is 7.2.= 1, running on a IA32 and a DEC Alpha; both machines show the same behavior. Bo= th are Debian Linux. Perhaps the bug lies in the locale definition supplied by Debian? --=20 Henry House The attached file is a digital signature. See <http://romana.hajhouse.org/p= gp> for information. My OpenPGP key: <http://romana.hajhouse.org/hajhouse.asc>.
> > lower/upper-casing is driven by locale, not encoding.
> >
> > Unfortunately you didn't mention anything about your locale setup...
>
> The server locale is en_US.UTF-8. (At least I set it up as such when
> installing PostgreSQL; I know no way to verify.) The server version is 7.2.1,
> running on a IA32 and a DEC Alpha; both machines show the same behavior. Both
> are Debian Linux. Perhaps the bug lies in the locale definition supplied by
> Debian?
I don't think current locale support code works with mutibyte
encodings such as UTF-8. See the thread tiled "Bug #659:
lower()/upper() bug on" on pgsql-bugs and pgsql-hackers.
In the mean time, a work around would be something like:
select convert(lower(convert('X', 'LATIN1')),'LATIN1','UNICODE');
That will convert UTF-8 'X' to its lower case if you are sure that 'X'
could be converted to ISO-8859-1.
Of course the problem with this method is:
Someone has suggested me a fix using UTF-8 locales, but I'm worried
about usage of UTF-8 and am waiting for the test result with my
Japanese data.
--
Tatsuo Ishii