Обсуждение: pg_restore problem "Found unexpected Block id"

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка

pg_restore problem "Found unexpected Block id"

От
"ramana.pls"
Дата:
Hi ,

I am getting an error while restoring the Database Backup. I am postgre sql
8.0 with Windows XP O.S.

while restoring the data i am getting

pg_restore: [custom archiver] found unexpected block ID (0) when reading
data --
 expected 4034

Plz provide any solution.

Thanks in advance



--
View this message in context:
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/pg-restore-problem-Found-unexpected-Block-id-tp5723501.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - admin mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Re: pg_restore problem "Found unexpected Block id"

От
Tom Lane
Дата:
"ramana.pls" <ramana.pls@gmail.com> writes:
> I am getting an error while restoring the Database Backup. I am postgre sql
> 8.0 with Windows XP O.S.

8.0?  You do know that's been out of support for several years now,
right?

> while restoring the data i am getting
> pg_restore: [custom archiver] found unexpected block ID (0) when reading
> data --
>  expected 4034

This looks somewhat like a pg_restore bug we fixed awhile back.  I'd
suggest updating to a more modern Postgres version and seeing if it
works any better.

            regards, tom lane


Re: pg_restore problem "Found unexpected Block id"

От
"Kevin Grittner"
Дата:
"ramana.pls" <ramana.pls@gmail.com> wrote:

> I am getting an error while restoring the Database Backup. I am
> postgre sql 8.0 with Windows XP O.S.

PostgreSQL version 8.0 has been out of support overall for years,
and out of support for Windows for years before that.

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-announce/2008-01/msg00005.php

http://www.postgresql.org/support/versioning/

Once you get past the immediate problems, it is extremely important
that you update to a supported version and stay up-to-date with
minor (bug-fix) releases.

Regarding the immediate problem, your report could use a lot more
detail.  What steps have you taken to get to where you are now?
Exactly what version of PostgreSQL is this (8.0.what?)?

http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Guide_to_reporting_problems

Without knowing more, it's hard to give much advice.

-Kevin


Re: pg_restore problem "Found unexpected Block id"

От
"Kevin Grittner"
Дата:
[copying the list; please keep the list copied on all replies]

Ramana Panda <ramana.pls@gmail.com> wrote:

> I am using the Version : *"PostgreSQL 8.0.0 on i686-pc-mingw32,
> compiled by GCC gcc.exe (GCC) 3.4.2 (mingw-special)"*

You didn't even keep up on bug fix releases?  It's amazing that your
database is still running.

> It is a running application. It is very difficult to update all at
> once.  I need to change the front end also.

You are in danger of losing all your data without having a usable
backup.  Consider how difficult that position will be by comparison.

> Sorry for inconvinience.

No need to apologize; it won't have much impact on me when your data
is lost.

> I have taken backup on 09-09-2012. it is working fine.

Whatever you do, don't overwrite or delete that backup!  That may be
something you will need to use for recovery.

> with 10th Sep  Backup,  while restoring it is giving error message
> after some tables restored:
>
> *pg_restore: [custom archiver] found unexpected block ID (0) when
> reading data -- expected 4034
> *
> O.S. Version : Windows XP with Service Pack 3

If the data in this database has any value to you, you should
upgrade to *at least* the last version of 8.2 *IMMEDIATELY*, since
that's the release where some very serious bugs related to Windows
were fixed.  Try running the pg_dump version from the newer version,
and you might still be able to back up recent work; otherwise you
will need to restore from your last usable backup and redo all work
from that point on.  8.2 went out of support last year, but it would
be a huge step forward in stability on Windows without any major
incompatibilities for application code, and should buy you a little
time to deal with working through some of the bumps in converting to
later versions.  You should really be targeting the 9.1 release at
this point.

-Kevin