Обсуждение: pgadmin3 removed from Fedora 10+
Hi, Just a FYI: Because of license issues, pgadmin3 was removed from Fedora 10 repository, and also it won't be in Fedora 11 and beyond. I will continue packaging pgadmin3 as usual in http://yum.pgsqlrpms.org , as usual. Regards, -- Devrim GÜNDÜZ, RHCE devrim~gunduz.org, devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr http://www.gunduz.org
Devrim GÜNDÜZ escreveu: > Just a FYI: Because of license issues, pgadmin3 was removed from Fedora > 10 repository, and also it won't be in Fedora 11 and beyond. > Oh! IANAL, but I understand the text-is-vague point. So why we're using an obsolete license? According to [1], if we upgrade the license, pgAdmin will be back to Fedora's repository. Some time ago, we had a discussion to make this upgrade possible but don't know if we had an agreement on it. Anyone? > I will continue packaging pgadmin3 as usual in http://yum.pgsqlrpms.org > , as usual. > Cool. ;) [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Artistic1Removal -- Euler Taveira de Oliveira http://www.timbira.com/
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 2:18 AM, Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler@timbira.com> wrote: > Devrim GÜNDÜZ escreveu: >> Just a FYI: Because of license issues, pgadmin3 was removed from Fedora >> 10 repository, and also it won't be in Fedora 11 and beyond. Err, that happened some months ago. > Oh! IANAL, but I understand the text-is-vague point. So why we're using an > obsolete license? According to [1], if we upgrade the license, pgAdmin will be > back to Fedora's repository. > > Some time ago, we had a discussion to make this upgrade possible but don't > know if we had an agreement on it. Anyone? Not everyone agreed :-( >> I will continue packaging pgadmin3 as usual in http://yum.pgsqlrpms.org >> , as usual. >> > Cool. ;) Yes; thanks Devrim :-) -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com