Обсуждение: To-Do List
I've just updated and re-organised the pgAdmin To-Do list. It's checked into CVS & updated on the website. If there's anything I've missed, please let me know. Regards, Dave.
Le Mercredi 20 Février 2002 10:23, Dave Page a écrit : > If there's anything I've missed, please let me > know. IMHO, PostgreSQL installer under Cygwin is ***essential***. This is the next thing after table alter column. By the way, when do you think you will be ablt to fix view definition, just for info? Cheers, Jean-Michel
> -----Original Message----- > From: Jean-Michel POURE [mailto:jm.poure@freesurf.fr] > Sent: 20 February 2002 10:05 > To: Dave Page; pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] To-Do List > > > Le Mercredi 20 Février 2002 10:23, Dave Page a écrit : > > If there's anything I've missed, please let me > > know. > > IMHO, PostgreSQL installer under Cygwin is ***essential***. It is essential to PostgreSQL, but not necessarily to pgAdmin. Certainly it will be very useful. > This is the next > thing after table alter column. By the way, when do you think > you will be > ablt to fix view definition, just for info? Fixed that (you forgot to reset the tag on txtProperties(0) at the end of frmView.Initialise. I'm just working on rename (which is slightly broken now :-( ) at the moment... /D
Hi Dave, I see plpgsql_call_handler is part of user objects in function list. Shouldn't it be part of system objects? Cheers, Jean-Michel
> -----Original Message----- > From: Jean-Michel POURE [mailto:jm.poure@freesurf.fr] > Sent: 20 February 2002 10:20 > To: Dave Page > Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] To-Do List > > > Le Mercredi 20 Février 2002 11:13, Dave Page a écrit : > > Fixed that (you forgot to reset the tag on txtProperties(0) > at the end > > of frmView.Initialise. > > > > I'm just working on rename (which is slightly broken now > :-( ) at the > > moment... > > OK, thanks. Seems like I am a little kid breaking > everything... There's over 30,000 lines of code in there now. I'm not at all surprised that you need a while to get familiar with it. Anyhoo, rename wasn't broken - pgAdmin had started an instance of the old compiled pgSchema, rather than the version I thought I was running in the debugger. It works now anyway (and is checked in). As I said above, you had forgotten to reset the tags (which we use a 'dirty' flags) at the end of the Initialise sub. I can see 2 outstanding issues at the moment: 1) Rollback in case of failure is not yet enabled (or tested?) 2) The new OID is not yet retrieved. I also noticed that following a 'Refresh Below' on the Views icon, the comment for a view on which the definition has been changed vanishes. We should probably invalidate the comment cache after the drop/recreate. Regards, Dave.
Hi Dave, Altering view definition is still broken. Can you help me understand why? This is not a question of .dll as I recompiled everything a restarted the computer. > 1) Rollback in case of failure is not yet enabled (or tested?) The code is commented. I will uncomment after 2) is fixes. > 2) The new OID is not yet retrieved. I really don't know how to do it. Can you do it for me please? > I also noticed that following a 'Refresh Below' on the Views icon, the > comment for a view on which the definition has been changed vanishes. We > should probably invalidate the comment cache after the drop/recreate. OK, this can be easily done. /Jean-Michel
> -----Original Message----- > From: Jean-Michel POURE [mailto:jm.poure@freesurf.fr] > Sent: 20 February 2002 13:23 > To: Dave Page > Cc: pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] To-Do List > > > Hi Dave, > > Altering view definition is still broken. Can you help me > understand why? I just updated from CVS, checked for uncomitted changes (there weren't any) and recompiled using BuildAll.bat and everything works perfectly - rename and alter definition. > This is not a question of .dll as I recompiled everything a > restarted the > computer. Try a CVS Update. > > 1) Rollback in case of failure is not yet enabled (or tested?) > The code is commented. I will uncomment after 2) is fixes. OK. > > 2) The new OID is not yet retrieved. > I really don't know how to do it. Can you do it for me please? Not right now (sorry, today is rent increase letter day when we print 5000 rent increase notices for our tenants - it's a tad hectic right now), but it's pretty easy. You know how you re-get the view definition after updating it, to pick up the syntax changes that PostgreSQL makes to it? All you need to do is modify the query to get the OID from pg_class as well, and update lOID. > > I also noticed that following a 'Refresh Below' on the > Views icon, the > > comment for a view on which the definition has been changed > vanishes. > > We should probably invalidate the comment cache after the > > drop/recreate. > OK, this can be easily done. Ta. Regards, Dave.