Re: transactions

In article <200210161647.g9GGl4t08435@candle.pha.pa.us>,
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us (Bruce Momjian) writes:

>> To be fair, in the Oracle posting, they actually said PostgreSQL
>> lacked the "transactional features" of "any commercial enterprise
>> database".  While that is presumably something beyond just
>> "transactions", I was completely unclear about what it was supposed
>> actually to be.  Anyone got any ideas?

> They were confusing us with MySQL.  It was a marketing guy.

... who didn't know that MySQL _does_ support transactions :-)