Re: transactions
От | Shridhar Daithankar |
---|---|
Тема | Re: transactions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3DB45407.22160.AC7AED2@localhost обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: transactions (Harald Fuchs <hf@colibri.de>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On 17 Oct 2002 at 11:47, Harald Fuchs wrote: > In article <200210161647.g9GGl4t08435@candle.pha.pa.us>, > pgman@candle.pha.pa.us (Bruce Momjian) writes: > > >> To be fair, in the Oracle posting, they actually said PostgreSQL > >> lacked the "transactional features" of "any commercial enterprise > >> database". While that is presumably something beyond just > >> "transactions", I was completely unclear about what it was supposed > >> actually to be. Anyone got any ideas? > > > They were confusing us with MySQL. It was a marketing guy. > > ... who didn't know that MySQL _does_ support transactions :-) So innodb is default now? Bye Shridhar -- Male, n.: A member of the unconsidered, or negligible sex. The male of the human race is commonly known to the female as Mere Man. The genus has two varieties: good providers and bad providers. -- Ambrose Bierce, "The Devil's Dictionary"
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: