Re: Re: New Linux xfs/reiser file systems

Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:

> > 
> > When compared to the earlier ones (including XFS), you'll note that ReiserFS
> > performance is rather poor in some of the tests  - it takes 37 vs. 13
> > seconds for 8192 inserts, when the inserts are different transactions.
> 
> That is all the fsync delay, probably, and it should be using fdatasync()
> on that kernel.

And it does seem to work that way with XFS...

-- 
Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Red Hat, Inc.