Re: Re: New Linux xfs/reiser file systems
Re: TABLE RENAME/NUMERIC FILENAMES (Was: New Linux xfs/reiser file systems)
От:
Hannu Krosing <hannu@tm.ee>
Дата:
RE: Re: New Linux xfs/reiser file systems
От:
"Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>
Дата:
RE: Re: New Linux xfs/reiser file systems
От:
"Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>
Дата:
Re: Re: New Linux xfs/reiser file systems
От:
teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød)
Дата:
teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød) writes: > teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød) writes: > > > "Ken Hirsch" writes: > > > > > I don't have a machine with XFS installed and it will be at least a week > > > before I could get around to a build. Any volunteers? > > > > I think I could do that... any useful benchmarks to run? > > In lack of bigger benchmarks, I tried postgresql 7.1 on a Red Hat > Linux 7.1 system with the SGI XFS modifications. The differences were > very small. And here is the one for ReiserFS - same kernel, but recompiled to turn off debugging When compared to the earlier ones (including XFS), you'll note that ReiserFS performance is rather poor in some of the tests - it takes 37 vs. 13 seconds for 8192 inserts, when the inserts are different transactions. -- Trond Eivind Glomsrød Red Hat, Inc.
