Re: Re: List response time...
| От | teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød) |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Re: List response time... |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | xuyae0sg8ol.fsf@halden.devel.redhat.com обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: List response time... (Ian Lance Taylor <ian@airs.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Ian Lance Taylor <ian@airs.com> writes: > Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org> writes: > > > Mailing lists don't scale well to large numbers of subscribers. I see this > > delay constantly,on multiple lists. The bigger the list gets, the slower the > > list gets (and the more loaded the server gets, right Marc? :-)). > > Note that the postgresql.org mail server is still running sendmail. > In my personal experience with sources.redhat.com, qmail is a much > better choice to handle large mailing lists. When we switched from > sendmail to qmail, mailing list delays dropped from hours, or > sometimes even days, to seconds. The MTA used for various redhat.com mailing lists is postfix (and mailman as listmanager) -- Trond Eivind Glomsrød Red Hat, Inc.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: