Re: Re: List response time...

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød)
Тема Re: Re: List response time...
Дата
Msg-id xuyae0sg8ol.fsf@halden.devel.redhat.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: List response time...  (Ian Lance Taylor <ian@airs.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Ian Lance Taylor <ian@airs.com> writes:

> Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org> writes:
> 
> > Mailing lists don't scale well to large numbers of subscribers.  I see this 
> > delay constantly,on multiple lists.  The bigger the list gets, the slower the 
> > list gets (and the more loaded the server gets, right Marc? :-)).
> 
> Note that the postgresql.org mail server is still running sendmail.
> In my personal experience with sources.redhat.com, qmail is a much
> better choice to handle large mailing lists.  When we switched from
> sendmail to qmail, mailing list delays dropped from hours, or
> sometimes even days, to seconds.

The MTA used for various redhat.com mailing lists is postfix (and
mailman as listmanager)

-- 
Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Red Hat, Inc.


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tatsuo Ishii
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Locale by default?
Следующее
От: teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød)
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: bugs - lets call an exterminator!