Bjoern,
> Good to know.
>
> What do you think is faster: 3 drives in raid 1 or 3 drives in raid
> 5?
My experience? Raid 1. But that depends on other factors as well;
your controller (software controllers use system RAM and thus lower
performance), what kind of reads you're getting and how often. IMHO,
RAID 5 is faster for sequential reads (lareg numbers of records on
clustered tables), RAID 1 for random reads.
And keep in mind: RAID 5 is *bad* for data writes. In my experience,
database data-write performance on RAID 5 UW SCSI is as slow as IDE
drives, particulary for updating large numbers of records, *unless* the
updated records are sequentially updated and clustered.
But in a multi-user write-often setup, RAID 5 will slow you down and
RAID 1 is better.
Did that help?
-Josh Berkus