Re: PL/pgSQL TODO

Bruce,

> I have reached this message and I your TODO item discussion was:
> 

>http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&threadm=20020517114156.Q20428-100000%40megazone23.bigpanda.com&rnum=18&prev=/groups%3Fq%3DJosh%2BBerkus%2Bgroup:comp.databases.postgresql.*%26start%3D10%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26scoring%3Dd%26selm%3D20020517114156.Q20428-100000%2540megazone23.bigpanda.com%26rnum%3D18

Nope.  Wrong discussion.  I'm referring to a 14-item list John Proctor
and I composed to enhance PL/pgSQL and make it equal to Oracle's
PL/SQL.   I'll dig through my sent mail and find it.

Not that the statement-deferrable constraints would be a bad thing, at
all.

-Josh

______AGLIO DATABASE SOLUTIONS___________________________                                      Josh Berkus Complete
informationtechnology      josh@agliodbs.com  and data management solutions       (415) 565-7293 for law firms, small
businesses       fax 621-2533   and non-profit organizations.      San Francisco