Re: PL/pgSQL TODO

Tom Lane wrote:
> Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
> > I was just checking the TODO list and noticed that none of my suggestions or 
> > John Proctors suggestions regarding PL/pgSQL improvements had made it on to 
> > the list.  Is this because our ideas have been rejected, or because nobody 
> > has time to deal with the TODO list?
> 
> Bruce normally maintains the TODO list, and he's been on vacation all
> this month (won't be back till June 1, I believe).  It's just lagging
> a bit ...

I have reached this message and I your TODO item discussion was:

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&threadm=20020517114156.Q20428-100000%40megazone23.bigpanda.com&rnum=18&prev=/groups%3Fq%3DJosh%2BBerkus%2Bgroup:comp.databases.postgresql.*%26start%3D10%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26scoring%3Dd%26selm%3D20020517114156.Q20428-100000%2540megazone23.bigpanda.com%26rnum%3D18

And I assume the TODO item is:
* Allow DEFERRABLE UNIQUE constraints

Added to TODO under Referential Integrity.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026