Recently, I've submited an updated patch for the latest zh_CN po files in the pgfoundry.
------------------ Original ------------------
From: "Peter Eisentraut";<peter_e@gmx.net>;
Date: Sun, Sep 20, 2015 12:50 PM
To: "Alvaro Herrera"<alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>; "Rugal Bernstein"<tenjindescend@gmail.com>;
Cc: "Heikki Linnakangas"<hlinnaka@iki.fi>; "pgsql-translators"<pgsql-translators@postgresql.org>; "He Xiong"<iihero@qq.com>;
Subject: Re: [pgsql-translators] A better translation version of Chinese forpsql/po/zh_CN.po file
On 9/4/15 1:31 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Rugal Bernstein wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> Sorry for the later response. I am not familiar with the commit procedure.
>> I am here to raise this patch again in the 2015-11 commitfest.
>> Still the same, I am pretty confident with my translation. I guarantee it
>> is very orthodox and much more native than the TW version.
>
> Hi,
>
> Please have a look at this website: https://babel.postgresql.org/
> In there, you will find a lot of information about the current status of
> the translation of all the various branches for the language, as well as
> a git repository that you can clone. The repository contains branches
> for each active Postgres branch.
>
> The methodology I recommend you follow is to download a .po file from
> the website, then use it as a base to apply your new translations.
>
> I just pushed your translation to the master branch (which is for
> Postgres 9.5) -- to do so, I downloaded
> https://babel.postgresql.org/po-current/psql-zh_CN.po (linked in the
> website) then ran "msgmerge your-file.po psql-zh_CN.po", then committed
> that as the new version of psql/zh_CN.po.
If I interpret the rest of this thread correctly, then the proposed
changes were to make the style more suitable for TW. I don't know if
updating the CN file was correct.